|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 20, 2017 13:35:05 GMT -6
bring them back, they are fun
|
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on Apr 20, 2017 13:35:46 GMT -6
i feel like we can have them since rw isn't in the league
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Apr 20, 2017 13:49:14 GMT -6
example please?
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Apr 20, 2017 13:53:07 GMT -6
They could be fun - but they could also be a huge pain in the ass for 20s.
|
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on Apr 20, 2017 13:53:47 GMT -6
Sonics send: Nate Robinson Kings send: 3056 Kings 1st round pick (top 3 protected) Right for Sonics to pick swap in 3057 |
|
|
|
Post by ANK1990 on Apr 20, 2017 14:02:24 GMT -6
I like it
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM 
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Apr 20, 2017 14:02:51 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Apr 20, 2017 14:04:02 GMT -6
If we do change, it shouldn't be retroactive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Face-in on Apr 20, 2017 14:33:55 GMT -6
Save the stipulations for 5.0
|
|
|
|
Post by FectaDEEZ on Apr 20, 2017 14:46:39 GMT -6
I like the idea of being able to trade picks with protections. But agree with Fason, lets just wait until 5.0.
The other shit like "only if player is bought out" is trash IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Apr 20, 2017 14:57:52 GMT -6
no
because all it does is foment dispute, and the commish inevitably has to be king babysitter and stop the squabbling
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Apr 20, 2017 14:58:28 GMT -6
No
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Apr 20, 2017 15:13:01 GMT -6
I'm fine with pick protections and pick swaps
Would never allow a pick stipulation based on buying someone out
|
|
|
|
Post by SugarShaun on Apr 20, 2017 20:38:44 GMT -6
Pick protection would make the lotto even more interesting. I like it
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Apr 20, 2017 22:00:32 GMT -6
Please god no
|
|
![[Account Deleted] Avatar](http://storage.proboards.com/5589790/avatar/ZhaFVHTxVPwmyuOiOKEd.png)
