|
|
Post by gbgalla24 on Jun 15, 2017 22:42:46 GMT -6
Bankz editing posts is not allowed, FYI. We can't have people changing the paper trail or erasing bread crumbs.
|
|
Bankz
Former GM 
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jun 15, 2017 22:46:04 GMT -6
sorry I was just deleting a comma after soup's name...
Wont happen moving forward
|
|
|
|
Post by SPL on Jun 15, 2017 22:48:03 GMT -6
Bankz voting against soup in round 1 and 2 at the end of the round when the vote does not matter, now protecting soup this round?
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jun 15, 2017 22:52:45 GMT -6
Bankz voting against soup in round 1 and 2 at the end of the round when the vote does not matter, now protecting soup this round? All votes matter... Eric is literally tracking and basing opinions on them. And how is this protecting Soup? He very well may be a mafia member. But so far you are 0 for 2 and co signed someone who literally voted a civilian off over someone he feels is a mafia member. You even quoted his breakdown (in which he tracked votes) and went on to accuse more people of being in the Mafia. At this point have accused 20, pete, soup, Delap, Heebs and now me as being Mafia members... Dude your sloppy |
|
|
|
Post by SPL on Jun 15, 2017 22:57:23 GMT -6
Bankz voting against soup in round 1 and 2 at the end of the round when the vote does not matter, now protecting soup this round? All votes matter... Eric is literally tracking and basing opinions on them. And how is this protecting Soup? He very well may be a mafia member. But so far you are 0 for 2 and co signed someone who literally voted a civilian off over someone he feels is a mafia member. You even quoted his breakdown (in which he tracked votes) and went on to accuse more people of being in the Mafia. At this point have accused 20, pete, soup, Delap, Heebs and now me as being Mafia members... Dude your sloppy This game is all about actions and reactions. I casted thoughts at 20s, soup and Pete. Why the fuck as a mafia would I create a paper trail to our votes? If I was creating an uproar and civs voted them out, then you would have a point. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jun 15, 2017 23:00:57 GMT -6
All votes matter... Eric is literally tracking and basing opinions on them. And how is this protecting Soup? He very well may be a mafia member. But so far you are 0 for 2 and co signed someone who literally voted a civilian off over someone he feels is a mafia member. You even quoted his breakdown (in which he tracked votes) and went on to accuse more people of being in the Mafia. At this point have accused 20, pete, soup, Delap, Heebs and now me as being Mafia members... Dude your sloppy This game is all about actions and reactions. I casted thoughts at 20s, soup and Pete. Why the fuck as a mafia would I create a paper trail to our votes? If I was creating an uproar and civs voted them out, then you would have a point. If you were mafia why the fuck would you tell us you were mafia? |
|
|
|
Post by SPL on Jun 15, 2017 23:02:08 GMT -6
This game is all about actions and reactions. I casted thoughts at 20s, soup and Pete. Why the fuck as a mafia would I create a paper trail to our votes? If I was creating an uproar and civs voted them out, then you would have a point. If you were mafia why the fuck would you tell us you were mafia? I did last round |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jun 15, 2017 23:04:31 GMT -6
If you were mafia why the fuck would you tell us you were mafia? I did last round No shit. And you got your ass toasted about it you didn't tell us the first time you were mafia. Your play has been erratic at best. |
|
|
|
Post by SPL on Jun 15, 2017 23:09:37 GMT -6
No shit. And you got your ass toasted about it you didn't tell us the first time you were mafia. Your play has been erratic at best. It was obvious after BK was killed by the BG last round. You guys hit on 2 mafia on day 1 and I thought the best play was to sacrifice. If you go back to my round 1, 2, I played those hands well. I have been transparent and consistent this round, you have casted swing votes to remove civs as my vote remained on you. As I said, votes on me, prove nothing and I could very well be gone next round. However, if we hit on soup, there is more telling info. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jun 15, 2017 23:13:09 GMT -6
I don't think I've once casted a swing vote in this game. Maybe I'm wrong. Or maybe you don't know what swing vote means. Or maybe you're grasping at straws here.
|
|
|
|
Post by SPL on Jun 15, 2017 23:13:15 GMT -6
I would recommend this, we vote soup and cop inspects me tonight
|
|
|
|
Post by SPL on Jun 15, 2017 23:14:42 GMT -6
I don't think I've once casted a swing vote in this game. Maybe I'm wrong. Or maybe you don't know what swing vote means. Or maybe you're grasping at straws here. Read Eric's previous post, he laid out the duration of time in when your votes came on. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jun 15, 2017 23:17:02 GMT -6
There's better ways to sacrifice then say hey guys I'm mafia.
|
|
|
|
Post by SPL on Jun 15, 2017 23:18:56 GMT -6
I would recommend this, we vote soup and cop inspects me tonight If we hit on soup, we have a good list to run down of people he is working with. If I am wrong on soup, the cop will know my role and if I was Mafia it would be a 2-2 exchange. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jun 15, 2017 23:30:48 GMT -6
I would recommend this, we vote soup and cop inspects me tonight If we hit on soup, we have a good list to run down of people he is working with. If I am wrong on soup, the cop will know my role and if I was Mafia it would be a 2-2 exchange. When you're wrong we lose 2 more civs and the mafia has taken over control of the game. You've literally listed like 7 people as mafia. You're all over the place. It's the same way you played when you won the game as mafia. You think we find out nothing by voting you but I think your play has strongly suggested that you're working with eric, gbg, and maybe majic. When you're revealed mafia we will have the same working list to go off of. |
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jun 16, 2017 6:12:35 GMT -6
i feel much better about my SPL vote after reading this nonsense for the last 2 pages
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Jun 16, 2017 6:27:19 GMT -6
I feel like I know less after reading the last two pages.
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jun 16, 2017 6:31:34 GMT -6
Can someone explain the positives at this point of the game to exposing the cop like SPL wants to happen? This is my first game in and to me that sounds absurd to do. Why would you give the mafia more information to use against us? To me you're just asking to put a huge bullseye on the cop since he is our most powerful civilian.
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Jun 16, 2017 6:39:01 GMT -6
If the cop knows a mafia member then we could vote a mafia out, have the bodyguard protect the cop, kill another mafia member, then have one more night period to do an investigation and potentially find a third mafia member to root out.
But this only works if the cop has successfully found a mafia already.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Jun 16, 2017 6:47:28 GMT -6
So I got pretty drunk last night and apparently voted for SPL?
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jun 16, 2017 6:51:29 GMT -6
you made a good choice, herb.
|
|
|
|
Post by FectaDEEZ on Jun 16, 2017 7:13:09 GMT -6
Im still leaning towards Soup or Majic and I think Majic would be less helpful to the town than 20s so as of now my vote is Majic
|
|
|
|
Post by Majic on Jun 16, 2017 7:23:40 GMT -6
Im still leaning towards Soup or Majic and I think Majic would be less helpful to the town than 20s so as of now my vote is MajicI am not sure what I have done to make you want to vote for me. I was inactive and then had a logical conversation with Soup about Odin and thought we made the right choice. we now know that was a mistake, but if you look at why we actually voted for him it made sense at the time. I personally think the back and forth between SPL and Soup is interesting, and likely 1 of them is mafia. personally I am leaning towards Soup being mafia, but that is more of a gut feeling. SPL asking for the cop to come forward isnt a terrible idea, we could kill 2 mafia members in exchange for the bodyguard, and then have a shot at another Mafia member before losing the cop |
|
|
|
Post by gbgalla24 on Jun 16, 2017 7:29:12 GMT -6
Bankz voting against soup in round 1 and 2 at the end of the round when the vote does not matter, now protecting soup this round? All votes matter... Eric is literally tracking and basing opinions on them. And how is this protecting Soup? He very well may be a mafia member. But so far you are 0 for 2 and co signed someone who literally voted a civilian off over someone he feels is a mafia member. You even quoted his breakdown (in which he tracked votes) and went on to accuse more people of being in the Mafia. At this point have accused 20, pete, soup, Delap, Heebs and now me as being Mafia members... Dude your sloppy Holding it against people voting for a civ in round 1 when if they're a civilian 11 of the 15 people they can vote for are civilians isn't productive, imo. Not to defend SPL, but a lot of people voted for a civ in round 1 because we knew his goal was not to win as a civilian, but rather he wanted to make sure eric lost. |
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jun 16, 2017 7:31:06 GMT -6
How does the cop thing work?
A) Does the cop ask Anky "is player X a mafia member?" and Ankly answers yes or no
B) Does Ank just PM the cop a Mafia member
If it's B then I see why we would want the cop to chime in now.
If it's A then the cop could be just as clueless as the rest of us. And all we would have done is put him in the line of fire.
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jun 16, 2017 7:34:06 GMT -6
It's A.
But having a known civilian is also a good thing for him to know, so he can steer us away from killing a known civ, through persuasion
|
|
|
|
Post by gbgalla24 on Jun 16, 2017 7:34:55 GMT -6
How does the cop thing work? A) Does the cop ask Anky "is player X a mafia member?" and Ankly answers yes or no B) Does Ank just PM the cop a Mafia member If it's B then I see why we would want the cop to chime in now. If it's A then the cop could be just as clueless as the rest of us. And all we would have done is put him in the line of fire. A cop decides who they want to investigate and pm's it to Ank, Ankly then pm's the cop back and let's them know if said person is a civilian or a mafia member. I'm not sure if they tell the cop if the person they investigate is the bodyguard or if they just tell them they are a civilian. |
|
|
|
Post by MistleTacoe on Jun 16, 2017 7:36:34 GMT -6
I feel like I know less after reading the last two pages. Like |
|
|
|
Post by gbgalla24 on Jun 16, 2017 7:36:39 GMT -6
It's A. But having a known civilian is also a good thing for him to know, so he can steer us away from killing a known civ, through persuasion At this point, when there are 4 mafia members it's tough to say that the cop should come out to tell us who civilians are because the mafia would just target the known civs after they kill the bodyguard and the cop. |
|
|
|
Post by SPL on Jun 16, 2017 7:39:17 GMT -6
If we hit on soup, we have a good list to run down of people he is working with. If I am wrong on soup, the cop will know my role and if I was Mafia it would be a 2-2 exchange. When you're wrong we lose 2 more civs and the mafia has taken over control of the game. You've literally listed like 7 people as mafia. You're all over the place. It's the same way you played when you won the game as mafia. You think we find out nothing by voting you but I think your play has strongly suggested that you're working with eric, gbg, and maybe majic. When you're revealed mafia we will have the same working list to go off of. When you say you are suspicous of people it does not claim them as mafia. A big part of this game is talking out your theories on any inconsistencies that you see. I said on day 1 that I was suspicious of 3 individuals based off voting paterns with no information at the time. I said this round I was suspiocus off things that have transpired. However, in this game, I am not responsible for the loss of 1 civilian, so for people to be suspicous of me is a bit confusing. So far you are 2-2 in your votes in removing civs from the game and both of your votes came at a point that turned the vote to that individual.
|
|
![[Account Deleted] Avatar](http://storage.proboards.com/5589790/avatar/ZhaFVHTxVPwmyuOiOKEd.png)
