RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Apr 14, 2015 21:09:29 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Face-in on Apr 14, 2015 21:55:58 GMT -6
Good stuff, hopefully you can get on Bankz's podcast at the end of the season.
Also I'd like to apologize on behalf of the league for how the Kobe trade was handled.
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Apr 14, 2015 22:00:15 GMT -6
Big fan of the podcast. nice job, Rw.
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 14, 2015 22:24:42 GMT -6
Lol @ your take on the Collier deal. When you grow up you'll realize that when you agree to something in writing it is binding. I don't care how you think you interpreted the rule by a two word post in a thread, but if you were dumb enough to put those stipulations in a trade them you're sure as hell going to follow up with them.
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Apr 14, 2015 22:25:00 GMT -6
The one thing that is not clear to me is whether RW will defend himself if Bankz calls him stupid.
|
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Apr 14, 2015 22:27:18 GMT -6
Lol @ your take on the Collier deal. When you grow up you'll realize that when you agree to something in writing it is binding. I don't care how you think you interpreted the rule by a two word post in a thread, but if you were dumb enough to put those stipulations in a trade them you're sure as hell going to follow up with them. This makes little sense, if I post a deal that breaks the rules and the other gm agrees to it, the deal doesn't go through. Just because no one recognized it broke the rules doesn't make it binding.
|
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Apr 14, 2015 22:28:03 GMT -6
I also like to alienate myself with the new commish as soon as possible.
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 14, 2015 22:29:21 GMT -6
Gentlemen agreement trade backs werent enforced. That what Odin meant. When you put it in words as part of the deal it now ceases to be a gentlemens agreement. It becomes part of the deal.
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Apr 14, 2015 22:35:01 GMT -6
Gentlemen agreement trade backs werent enforced. That what Odin meant. When you put it in words as part of the deal it now ceases to be a gentlemens agreement. It becomes part of the deal. The gentlemen's agreement/explicit stipulation distinction was created after Odin stepped down as commish. Odin admitted that in the tread. I'd quote it, but that thread has been moved to the admin-only section.
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 14, 2015 22:45:20 GMT -6
Gentlemen agreement trade backs werent enforced. That what Odin meant. When you put it in words as part of the deal it now ceases to be a gentlemens agreement. It becomes part of the deal. The gentlemen's agreement/explicit stipulation distinction was created after Odin stepped down as commish. Odin admitted that in the tread. I'd quote it, but that thread has been moved to the admin-only section. "no, but i probably put no thought into the decision and i'm no longer commish soup makes the rules now"
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Apr 14, 2015 22:48:32 GMT -6
Thanks for quoting it. Most people wouldn't have done that and would have dug in.
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Apr 14, 2015 23:15:17 GMT -6
how long is the podcast?
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Apr 14, 2015 23:54:11 GMT -6
Glad I could motivate you into doing a podcast.
Calling you stupid was mean and childish but very accurate.
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 15, 2015 8:52:14 GMT -6
Thanks for quoting it. Most people wouldn't have done that and would have dug in. the fact that he made that "ruling" and was then one to be part of a trade that included a tradeback stipulation should show that no real thought went into that ruling and it clearly was not as black and white as RW is making it out to be.
|
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Apr 15, 2015 9:14:17 GMT -6
Glad I could motivate you into doing a podcast. Calling you stupid was mean and childish but very accurate. If you listened to the entire thing and this is your only response.... Yes! Keep on keeping on Bankz.
|
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Apr 15, 2015 9:23:08 GMT -6
Thanks for quoting it. Most people wouldn't have done that and would have dug in. the fact that he made that "ruling" and was then one to be part of a trade that included a tradeback stipulation should show that no real thought went into that ruling and it clearly was not as black and white as RW is making it out to be. It doesn't matter how much thought was or wasn't put into it. At the time of both the trade of Collier to the Hawks and the Hawks trading Collier to the Nets the rule explicitly stated trade backs are not enforceable. You decided after the trade was accepted on both sides that tradebacks established in the OP were enforceable. You have justified your decision and I'd agree the trade is in bad faith, but nonetheless it broke the rules.
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 15, 2015 9:26:41 GMT -6
the fact that he made that "ruling" and was then one to be part of a trade that included a tradeback stipulation should show that no real thought went into that ruling and it clearly was not as black and white as RW is making it out to be. It doesn't matter how much thought was or wasn't put into it. At the time of both the trade of Collier to the Hawks and the Hawks trading Collier to the Nets the rule explicitly stated trade backs are not enforceable. You decided after the trade was accepted on both sides that tradebacks established in the OP were enforceable. You have justified your decision and I'd agree the trade is in bad faith, but nonetheless it broke the rules. I truly believe you don't read shit that other people have posted, and post the same false shit over and over again.
|
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Apr 15, 2015 9:32:52 GMT -6
It doesn't matter how much thought was or wasn't put into it. At the time of both the trade of Collier to the Hawks and the Hawks trading Collier to the Nets the rule explicitly stated trade backs are not enforceable. You decided after the trade was accepted on both sides that tradebacks established in the OP were enforceable. You have justified your decision and I'd agree the trade is in bad faith, but nonetheless it broke the rules. I truly believe you don't read shit that other people have posted, and post the same false shit over and over again. I understand what you've been saying I just disagree. You think because no thought was put into the rule and that I agreed to the stipulation in the trade that it should and has been enforceable. My position is that rules posted at the time of the trade still apply regardless if I was aware of them at the time. It's a difference in opinions, that's all and it really doesn't matter at this point. I would like to ask you what happened with the Kobe to Utah deal?
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Apr 15, 2015 9:33:55 GMT -6
The money didn't work on the Kobe to Utah trade and they didn't fix it after Soup said there'd be severe punishments for people that pulled shit like they were planning to pull.
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Apr 15, 2015 10:13:10 GMT -6
Glad I could motivate you into doing a podcast. Calling you stupid was mean and childish but very accurate. If you listened to the entire thing and this is your only response.... Yes! Keep on keeping on Bankz. Two of the three podcast you have done have been focused on me. For someone calling another poster out for being "guns a blazing" and immature doing 20 minutes of shade on me makes you a hypocrite. As far as the podcast goes you still seem unfocused and not organized. The content of the podcast is poor but the production is very good.
|
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Apr 15, 2015 10:16:29 GMT -6
If you listened to the entire thing and this is your only response.... Yes! Keep on keeping on Bankz. Two of the three podcast you have done have been focused on me. For someone calling another poster out for being "guns a blazing" and immature doing 20 minutes of shade on me makes you a hypocrite. As far as the podcast goes you still seem unfocused and not organized. The content of the podcast is poor but the production is very good. You didn't listen to the entire thing did you?
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Apr 15, 2015 10:21:00 GMT -6
Two of the three podcast you have done have been focused on me. For someone calling another poster out for being "guns a blazing" and immature doing 20 minutes of shade on me makes you a hypocrite. As far as the podcast goes you still seem unfocused and not organized. The content of the podcast is poor but the production is very good. You didn't listen to the entire thing did you? I listened to the entire thing...
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 15, 2015 10:22:54 GMT -6
The money didn't work on the Kobe to Utah trade and they didn't fix it after Melanie said there'd be severe punishments for people that pulled shit like they were planning to pull. yeah, pretty much. it would have looked somewhat "legit" but it still would have been what it was going to be: slight collusion. I'm pretty happy the money didn't work because I was uncomfortable with it after I thought about the consequences.
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 15, 2015 10:28:05 GMT -6
there's nothing slight about it. it was absolute collusion.
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on Apr 15, 2015 10:29:13 GMT -6
it was absolute slight collusion
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 15, 2015 10:29:49 GMT -6
there's nothing slight about it. it was absolute collusion. well, yes. I don't disagree, but it was with a meh player. That's really the only point I'm making with that phrase.
|
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Apr 15, 2015 11:00:05 GMT -6
You didn't listen to the entire thing did you? I listened to the entire thing... You must not listen well "I don't understand why people feel the need to say you're stupid, you're and idiot and have no basis behind the claims, if you'd like to say this move you made was not good I'd love to discuss it but it always devolves (my favorite word this podcast) into name calling and you know grow up a little bit so I guess I am guilty of that as well with this podcast so I will try and abide by my own advice and do the same."
|
|
Bruns
Former GM
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 1,025
Dump Bucks: 35,800
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bruns on Apr 15, 2015 11:07:41 GMT -6
I dont know whats going on and I dont want to.
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Apr 15, 2015 11:12:24 GMT -6
I listened to the entire thing... You must not listen well "I don't understand why people feel the need to say you're stupid, you're and idiot and have no basis behind the claims, if you'd like to say this move you made was not good I'd love to discuss it but it always devolves (my favorite word this podcast) into name calling and you know grow up a little bit so I guess I am guilty of that as well with this podcast so I will try and abide by my own advice and do the same." So you just wanted the last word and wanted to move on? Motherfucker just dropped 20 minutes of shade and expects all to be well because he admits at the end he needs to take his own advice.
|
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Apr 15, 2015 12:26:49 GMT -6
You must not listen well "I don't understand why people feel the need to say you're stupid, you're and idiot and have no basis behind the claims, if you'd like to say this move you made was not good I'd love to discuss it but it always devolves (my favorite word this podcast) into name calling and you know grow up a little bit so I guess I am guilty of that as well with this podcast so I will try and abide by my own advice and do the same." So you just wanted the last word and wanted to move on? Motherfucker just dropped 20 minutes of shade and expects all to be well because he admits at the end he needs to take his own advice. If you'd like to discuss the content of my argument that's fine, but throwing out ambiguous insults gets redundant and old. Even your one minor attempt to talk about the podcast itself are thoughts stolen from shout. Would you like to address why you blew up in the 803 thread? I'd like to hear your side of the claim.
|
|