|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Jan 20, 2015 0:23:35 GMT -6
 Jerian Grant
Position: PG Age: 23 Height: 6'5 Weight: 204 School: Notre Dame B C B C+ D+ B
Strengths: Passing, Finishing Ability, Leadership
Weaknesses: Outside Shot, AgeGrant is one of the PGs in the discussion for the next level of guys after you get past the guys at the top. Many scouts feel he is worthy of a 1st round selection but he isn't likely to go as high as the top tier PGs. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2015 0:32:39 GMT -6
Eh
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Jan 20, 2015 8:42:49 GMT -6
C+ outside imo. This year is his worst shooting year, and he is still 30 percent from 3 and nearly 80 from FT. Plus he has a nice mid-range jump shot.
|
|
Bankz
Former GM 
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jan 20, 2015 10:13:35 GMT -6
Agree with Heebs.. need to +1 that outside
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Jan 20, 2015 10:16:28 GMT -6
don't want to inflate grades too much, going to leave him where he is. Grant might be getting the short end of the stick, but I want to have some variance in the look of prospects so they aren't all the same player.
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jan 20, 2015 10:22:14 GMT -6
the anti-Scottie Pippen approach, I like it
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Jan 21, 2015 2:53:29 GMT -6
C grades are such a turn off
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jan 21, 2015 13:00:21 GMT -6
Leading my fantasy team.. such a stud
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jan 29, 2015 18:45:28 GMT -6
C+! C+! C+! Last night proved it. Please 20s Navidad I really want to draft this cat top 10 |
|
|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Jan 29, 2015 19:30:42 GMT -6
not budging on this one, sorry guys
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jan 29, 2015 19:38:36 GMT -6
Booooooooooo
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jan 29, 2015 20:15:07 GMT -6
Doesn't make sense to penalize a player in order to have prospect variance imo
|
|
|
|
Post by Lazy Pete on Jan 29, 2015 20:44:19 GMT -6
[HASH]fire20s [HASH]rehire20s [HASH]fire20sagain
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2015 20:48:11 GMT -6
Bad move 20s
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jan 29, 2015 20:56:30 GMT -6
Really not a big deal, just voicing my opinion
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Jan 29, 2015 22:15:34 GMT -6
don't want to inflate grades too much, going to leave him where he is. Grant might be getting the short end of the stick, but I want to have some variance in the look of prospects so they aren't all the same player. Then you should make a realistic Petteway imo |
|
![[Account Deleted] Avatar](http://storage.proboards.com/5589790/avatar/ZhaFVHTxVPwmyuOiOKEd.png)
