|
|
Post by Druce on Oct 5, 2015 12:54:29 GMT -6
 Dennis Rodman 24 PF 6'7 210 SE Oklahoma State D+ D C- A A D Rodman comes from a small school where he absolutely dominated competition. He has a couple skills that translate fantastically to the pro level, and a couple others that simply do not. Dennis won't come close to the offensive production he put up in college. He will however make an immediate impact in effort. He rebounds the basketball with tenacity and determination, which is the same way he defends. He's not going to block a ton of shots, but he's a pest and disrupts the oppositions best post player. Rodman is no more than a screen setter on offense, but he's a game changer on defense and on the boards. |
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Oct 5, 2015 13:01:16 GMT -6
not sure about D pot just because of what it means, but I like the grades otherwise
|
|
|
|
Post by dilworth on Oct 5, 2015 13:06:58 GMT -6
not sure why there's D potential but I like the grades
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2015 13:09:30 GMT -6
Will draft
|
|
|
|
Post by Lazy Pete on Oct 5, 2015 13:37:26 GMT -6
The D potential takes into account his marriage to Madonna
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Oct 5, 2015 13:37:53 GMT -6
Seems pretty good to me.
I mean, D potential means his actual potential will be like 72, which is not horrible.
Given what we know about actual potential from eric's testing, it's not like he's going to suck.
He is built to be a defensive/rebounding big. With A/A grades already, it's not like he's going to need 90+ potential to be what he's going to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Oct 5, 2015 13:49:47 GMT -6
Seems pretty good to me. I mean, D potential means his actual potential will be like 72, which is not horrible. Given what we know about actual potential from eric's testing, it's not like he's going to suck. He is built to be a defensive/rebounding big. With A/A grades already, it's not like he's going to need 90+ potential to be what he's going to be. that was the thought process, he is what he is, and what he will continue to be |
|
|
|
Post by dilworth on Oct 5, 2015 15:32:34 GMT -6
I guess I just don't understand why we give people D potential knowing that they won't actually have D potential.
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Oct 5, 2015 15:37:56 GMT -6
I guess I just don't understand why we give people D potential knowing that they won't actually have D potential. that isn't whats been done here at all. i have no way of knowing what potential soup is going to give a guy, but honestly even if he had A pot, with those scoring grades he's never going to develop into a scorer so it's kind of irrelevant |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Oct 5, 2015 15:56:33 GMT -6
I guess I just don't understand why we give people D potential knowing that they won't actually have D potential. The same reason we give any prospect a shown potential - so show their scouted potential relative to other prospects. I suspect that most prospects with B shown potential don't have B hidden potential. Same with C. I'd bet the only shown potential that more often than not represents hidden potential is A. |
|
|
|
Post by SugarShaun on Oct 5, 2015 16:14:54 GMT -6
Looks good
|
|
|
|
Post by KwYawnza on Oct 8, 2015 7:31:40 GMT -6
I like to think that as human beings we all have A potential.
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Oct 8, 2015 16:54:18 GMT -6
he has potential
|
|
Bruns
Former GM 
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 1,025
Dump Bucks: 35,800
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bruns on Oct 23, 2015 16:52:20 GMT -6
what about that growth spurt?!?
|
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on Feb 19, 2016 15:53:44 GMT -6
So Rodman can legally play SF?  |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Feb 19, 2016 16:11:06 GMT -6
So Rodman can legally play SF?  |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Feb 20, 2016 19:50:48 GMT -6
D potential means his actual potential will be like 72, which is not horrible. Lol what? |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Feb 26, 2016 11:42:31 GMT -6
D potential means his actual potential will be like 72, which is not horrible. Lol what? What was Rodman's potential? |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Feb 26, 2016 13:18:37 GMT -6
What was Rodman's potential? Lower than 72 |
|
