Post by eric on Jun 21, 2016 18:42:49 GMT -6
Charles Barkley's Top Seven:
1 Jordan
2 Robertson
3 Russell
4 Kareem
5 Wilt
6 Kobe
7 Duncan
Jordan Russell and Kareem absolutely belong in any top seven. Not having any of them would be wrong. How you order them doesn't really bother me, but I would strongly urge for Jordan and Russell to be in the top two. So far so good. There are two points where the list is inarguably wrong:
1. Having Kobe above Duncan makes no sense in any way.
-Same rings
-Duncan has more MVPs
-Duncan has more Finals MVPs
-Duncan has better on/off (+7.7 to +5.6 regular season, +8.5 to +8.3 playoffs)
-Duncan has WAY better stats (.209 to .170 ws/48 regular season, .194 to .157 playoffs)
-Duncan has never played on a team where someone else was MVP.
Just get that right the heck out of here.
2. Having Robertson (at least) six spots above Magic makes no sense in any way.
-Magic has 5 rings, Robertson 1.
-Magic has 3 MVPs, Robertson 1.
-Magic has 3 Finals MVPs, Robertson 0. Robertson won a total of two playoff rounds with the Royals, both first round matchups.
-On/off doesn't go back that far but Magic has WAY better stats (.225 to .207, .208 to .178 playoffs)
-It could be fair to question Magic for never winning a ring without Kareem...
-...but neither did Oscar, and at least Magic made the Finals without him, so that's no argument for Oscar over Magic.
Oscar has to be below Magic, so if Magic isn't in your top seven than neither is Oscar.
.
So let's look at our list now:
1 Jordan
2 Russell
3 Magic
4 Kareem
5 LeBron
6 Duncan
7 Wilt
Now that's a list. The bottom three, like the top four, can be reordered if you like. LeBron's stats and on/off trump Duncan's, as do his personal awards, so I feel like his doing less with less doesn't tip the scales. LeBron's stats are slightly worse than Wilt's in the regular season and much better in the playoffs, which makes his superior team success even more emphatic to my mind.
1 Jordan
2 Robertson
3 Russell
4 Kareem
5 Wilt
6 Kobe
7 Duncan
Jordan Russell and Kareem absolutely belong in any top seven. Not having any of them would be wrong. How you order them doesn't really bother me, but I would strongly urge for Jordan and Russell to be in the top two. So far so good. There are two points where the list is inarguably wrong:
1. Having Kobe above Duncan makes no sense in any way.
-Same rings
-Duncan has more MVPs
-Duncan has more Finals MVPs
-Duncan has better on/off (+7.7 to +5.6 regular season, +8.5 to +8.3 playoffs)
-Duncan has WAY better stats (.209 to .170 ws/48 regular season, .194 to .157 playoffs)
-Duncan has never played on a team where someone else was MVP.
Just get that right the heck out of here.
2. Having Robertson (at least) six spots above Magic makes no sense in any way.
-Magic has 5 rings, Robertson 1.
-Magic has 3 MVPs, Robertson 1.
-Magic has 3 Finals MVPs, Robertson 0. Robertson won a total of two playoff rounds with the Royals, both first round matchups.
-On/off doesn't go back that far but Magic has WAY better stats (.225 to .207, .208 to .178 playoffs)
-It could be fair to question Magic for never winning a ring without Kareem...
-...but neither did Oscar, and at least Magic made the Finals without him, so that's no argument for Oscar over Magic.
Oscar has to be below Magic, so if Magic isn't in your top seven than neither is Oscar.
.
So let's look at our list now:
1 Jordan
2 Russell
3 Magic
4 Kareem
5 LeBron
6 Duncan
7 Wilt
Now that's a list. The bottom three, like the top four, can be reordered if you like. LeBron's stats and on/off trump Duncan's, as do his personal awards, so I feel like his doing less with less doesn't tip the scales. LeBron's stats are slightly worse than Wilt's in the regular season and much better in the playoffs, which makes his superior team success even more emphatic to my mind.