|
Post by Druce on Jul 7, 2014 11:06:31 GMT -6
I'm not sure why this was taken away, other than Bankz trading the same pick twice I believe. I don't see why we shouldn't be able to do this. We can add a penalty for someone who fucks up and trades the same pick twice, such as the second person who is traded the pick gets their next two available picks or something of that nature.
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Jul 7, 2014 11:25:11 GMT -6
I'm not against it
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Jul 7, 2014 11:27:53 GMT -6
Because canes
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jul 7, 2014 11:43:44 GMT -6
when i kept up with owed picks and a pick was protected, i would add the next year's pick to the owed picks thread so there wasn't any confusion.
|
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Jul 7, 2014 11:45:37 GMT -6
Didn't know this was banned. Yes, it should be allowed.
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Jul 7, 2014 11:50:36 GMT -6
It's obviously a terrible idea because RW supports it so I vote no.
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jul 7, 2014 15:24:52 GMT -6
so based on the responses and votes it seems as this has the green light to be allowed again then?
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Jul 7, 2014 15:51:30 GMT -6
Sure
|
|
|
Post by KwYawnza on Jul 7, 2014 18:59:16 GMT -6
I imagine this was banned because there are certain GMs with a habit of trading picks that don't actually exist.
As long as the mods have no problem keeping up/slapping down the offenders I be cool with it
|
|