|
|
Post by Heebs on Jan 28, 2017 17:19:02 GMT -6
 Age: 23 Position: SG Height: 6'5" Weight: 215 College: Kansas State B- B C C C+ A Scouting ReportMitch puts the shooting in shooting guard, but he is not afraid to take the ball inside. From the line, midrange, or behind the arc, he's going to get you buckets. And that's good, too, because he's a huge defensive liability. His athletic ability will allow him to get a steal or two, but his lack of discipline makes him a terrible perimeter and drive defender. However, scouts think his untapped potential could help him become a serviceable defender. |
|
|
|
Post by SPL on Jan 28, 2017 18:28:09 GMT -6
Should be pretty good
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2017 19:10:41 GMT -6
Los Angeles Laker great
|
|
|
|
Post by Face-in on Jan 29, 2017 16:50:54 GMT -6
Post #5,077
23 away from that +3
|
|
|
|
Post by MJ on Jan 30, 2017 11:57:18 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Jan 31, 2017 8:39:28 GMT -6
Lowered Mitch's defense. Everyone thank Ian.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2017 9:05:35 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Lazy Pete on Feb 2, 2017 9:31:01 GMT -6
The mendoza line for all IRL HOF candidacy
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2017 11:57:16 GMT -6
Should have lowered either outside or inside and left the defense at C+ imo Heebs |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Feb 2, 2017 12:21:26 GMT -6
Should have lowered either outside or inside and left the defense at C+ imo HeebsI appreciate the feedback, not least because I get to postpad without being obnoxious. I try to vary the builds of players while staying true to their college stats. Mitch was a very good scorer. Without making him 1.1, something needed to be a drawback. That something is his defense. He didn't steal/block the ball in college, so I leaned into that and just said he was a terrible defender. If 20s wants to make him a future superstar, he'll build him close to C+ defense with high potential. If 20s wants him to be an offensive stud and defensive liability, he'll make him as a solid C defense, which will be a liability until he has a few TCs and SC/RCs. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2017 13:24:25 GMT -6
Should have lowered either outside or inside and left the defense at C+ imo HeebsI appreciate the feedback, not least because I get to postpad without being obnoxious. I try to vary the builds of players while staying true to their college stats. Mitch was a very good scorer. Without making him 1.1, something needed to be a drawback. That something is his defense. He didn't steal/block the ball in college, so I leaned into that and just said he was a terrible defender. If 20s wants to make him a future superstar, he'll build him close to C+ defense with high potential. If 20s wants him to be an offensive stud and defensive liability, he'll make him as a solid C defense, which will be a liability until he has a few TCs and SC/RCs. C+ can still be very shitty defense and B-/B are till top 5-10 scoring grades |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Feb 2, 2017 13:28:06 GMT -6
I appreciate the feedback, not least because I get to postpad without being obnoxious. I try to vary the builds of players while staying true to their college stats. Mitch was a very good scorer. Without making him 1.1, something needed to be a drawback. That something is his defense. He didn't steal/block the ball in college, so I leaned into that and just said he was a terrible defender. If 20s wants to make him a future superstar, he'll build him close to C+ defense with high potential. If 20s wants him to be an offensive stud and defensive liability, he'll make him as a solid C defense, which will be a liability until he has a few TCs and SC/RCs. C+ can still be very shitty defense and B-/B are till top 5-10 scoring grades Fine. I made his scoring grades B-/B since you still think those are top 5-10. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2017 15:29:14 GMT -6
C+ can still be very shitty defense and B-/B are till top 5-10 scoring grades Fine. I made his scoring grades B-/B since you still think those are top 5-10.  |
|
|
|
Post by MJ on Feb 3, 2017 15:25:48 GMT -6
Whole lot of fuckery
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Feb 3, 2017 15:41:30 GMT -6
It's all a learning experience. I'm grateful to dump for showing me the error of my ways. |
|
|
|
Post by MJ on Feb 3, 2017 16:07:17 GMT -6
It's all a learning experience. I'm grateful to dump for showing me the error of my ways. Was quoting trailer park boys tbh |
|
|
|
Post by FectaDEEZ on Feb 20, 2017 13:15:18 GMT -6
Dude is gonna get buckets.
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Mar 8, 2017 20:01:52 GMT -6
1.1
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM 
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Mar 18, 2017 11:19:17 GMT -6
Like i give a fuck about Mitchell Richmond |
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on Mar 30, 2017 21:37:53 GMT -6
I don't think he's 1.1 fwiw
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Apr 2, 2017 11:37:33 GMT -6
All-Time Mitch Power Rankings:
1. Hedberg
2. Richmond
5,888,234. Albom
|
|
|
|
Post by BKay Jewelers on Apr 12, 2017 12:40:04 GMT -6
I want this guy
|
|
|
|
Post by SPL on Apr 16, 2017 21:22:03 GMT -6
Not sure the whole story on the changes to his defensive grade. I would expect at least a C+ from him.
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Apr 16, 2017 21:30:22 GMT -6
Not sure the whole story on the changes to his defensive grade. I would expect at least a C+ from him. He used to play on 2.0's Lakers team under the GM before buster, so dumptime mentioned it which prompted heebs to nerf him because  ? |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 17, 2017 0:02:08 GMT -6
All-Time Mitch Power Rankings: 1. Hedberg 2. Richmond 5,888,234. Albom Mitch Kramer Dazed and Confuses |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2017 8:13:47 GMT -6
Not sure the whole story on the changes to his defensive grade. I would expect at least a C+ from him. He used to play on 2.0's Lakers team under the GM before buster, so dumptime mentioned it which prompted heebs to nerf him because ? Dont be blaming me when it was you because you were yelling that the grades were too good from the mountaintop |
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Apr 17, 2017 8:56:20 GMT -6
Like i said, the fuck do i care about Mitch Richmond? I have no picks this year, Mitch could be F- everything for all I care.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2017 9:34:32 GMT -6
Lowered Mitch's defense. Everyone thank Ian. You were going on about how Heebs 's grades were too good in shout and what not so he went ahead and lowered some hence Mitch Richmond having C def instead of C+ IanBoyd |
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Apr 17, 2017 10:15:59 GMT -6
You were the one who prompted his downgrade because I'm guessing heebs assumed Mitch Richmond was somehow nostalgic to me like Rony Seikaly when you mentioned him being a "Laker great".
I didn't even say shit in this thread until you tagged me after he got nerfed.
Its not like he nerfed any of the other "grades too good" prospects
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Apr 17, 2017 11:33:44 GMT -6
I lowered his defense because I thought he was a top three pick with C+ defense. I lowered his scoring because I am allergic to dump flower pollen.
|
|
