|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 11:25:15 GMT -6
Going back I think it's pete
|
|
|
|
Post by FectaDEEZ on Jul 13, 2017 11:25:46 GMT -6
Im leaning Cane's. I was leaning that way a couple rounds ago and I think it still makes sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by FectaDEEZ on Jul 13, 2017 11:25:59 GMT -6
Canes
|
|
|
|
Post by FectaDEEZ on Jul 13, 2017 11:26:37 GMT -6
Going back I think it's peteWhy do you think its Pete? |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jul 13, 2017 11:27:46 GMT -6
Canes (2) - fecta, pete
Pete (1) - delap
Left to vote - Canes
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Jul 13, 2017 11:31:49 GMT -6
go back to 2 rounds ago. it played out exactly like game 2. a late tie that nobody broke. Why? because there were 2 civs in the tie. mafia didn't have to do anything but let RNG break the tie or let someone be dumb and kill one of the civs and then draw attention to himself
|
|
|
|
Post by FectaDEEZ on Jul 13, 2017 11:32:49 GMT -6
go back to 2 rounds ago. it played out exactly like game 2. a late tie that nobody broke. Why? because there were 2 civs in the tie. mafia didn't have to do anything but let RNG break the tie or let someone be dumb and kill one of the civs and then draw attention to himself The RNG could have easily killed a mafia member too, pretty risky to leave it up to that. |
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Jul 13, 2017 11:35:06 GMT -6
go back to 2 rounds ago. it played out exactly like game 2. a late tie that nobody broke. Why? because there were 2 civs in the tie. mafia didn't have to do anything but let RNG break the tie or let someone be dumb and kill one of the civs and then draw attention to himself The RNG could have easily killed a mafia member too, pretty risky to leave it up to that. How? it was me or odin. duc had a throwaway vote at GBG and didn't change to break the tie because he knew that breaking the tie would kill a civ and draw attention to himself later. |
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 12:01:10 GMT -6
Going back I think it's peteWhy do you think its Pete? Very hesitant to go after duc, even tried to sway (feebly) people to me. 20s pairings (a few pages back) work made sense, and ultimately, I trust you right now, so Pete it is. |
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Jul 13, 2017 12:14:32 GMT -6
Why do you think its Pete? Very hesitant to go after duc, even tried to sway (feebly) people to me. 20s pairings (a few pages back) work made sense, and ultimately, I trust you right now, so Pete it is. Im not sure about this logic. Pete's game has been eratic for sure. the 20s vote early was weird as fuck and last round he was the last to jump on duc. It would also be ballsy as fuck to pull off the self silence the final round and hope we turn on eachother. If anyone has the balls to do it, its pete. on the otherhand, fecta has been bandwagoning all game and could easily be playing the super sleeper civ role. His voting all game feels mafia to me. It's also possible you have been floating along with duc and if you have damn you. There is nobody that is 100% trustworthy at this point. all we can do is talk it out and make the best decision possible. |
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 12:17:21 GMT -6
I agree that Pete has big balls, hence my vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by FectaDEEZ on Jul 13, 2017 12:20:28 GMT -6
At this point I trust Delap, but I'm torn between Pete and Canes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 12:22:00 GMT -6
I don't trust anyone 100%, but I trust Canes the most.
|
|
|
|
Post by FectaDEEZ on Jul 13, 2017 12:24:38 GMT -6
Has anyone tallied Pete's voting record ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 12:26:12 GMT -6
Canes, operating under the assumption that you and I are civs, I'm looking back at fecta for "bandwagoning"... offhand I don't feel he has been, but I'll look into it
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 12:37:02 GMT -6
Okay, looking back, I'm even more convinced that it is Pete. He voted duc in Day 1, but was the only one and duc was a safe vote because RV was dying no matter what. Fecta was the first vote on RV.
Then, Pete tried to sway the SPL vote to Heebs.
Side note, Odin is dumb. He boldly stated 20s and GBG were mafia.
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 12:37:50 GMT -6
Fecta led the votes on RV and SPL. Didn't bandwagon. If he's mafia, congrats.
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Jul 13, 2017 12:40:11 GMT -6
Fecta led the votes on RV and SPL. Didn't bandwagon. If he's mafia, congrats. did he lead tho? wouldn't it be a brilliant mafia move to throw a vote at a fellow mafia early in the game and then if/when that mafia dies he has cover for a long time |
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 12:44:18 GMT -6
Also, on Day 3, Pete kept trying to implicate that 20s was self-silenced and discredit him. Even when 20s came out and said he was the cop, he wasn't killed. To me that shows mafia leaving him alive an extra night to discredit him. Classic Pete
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jul 13, 2017 13:01:52 GMT -6
1 hour
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Jul 13, 2017 13:14:02 GMT -6
Also, on Day 3, Pete kept trying to implicate that 20s was self-silenced and discredit him. Even when 20s came out and said he was the cop, he wasn't killed. To me that shows mafia leaving him alive an extra night to discredit him. Classic Pete this makes a lot of sense to me, but Im a bit stuck on fecta. his silence right now troubles me. Feels like he is waiting for us to jump on pete. I am overthinking the fuck out of this |
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 13:25:01 GMT -6
The issue is, we all need to agree. Otherwise we get RNG or the mafia member killing immediately in OT and winning
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 13:27:56 GMT -6
Fecta you around? Chime in.
You said you trust me. Change to pete?
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Jul 13, 2017 13:34:18 GMT -6
Fecta you around? Chime in. You said you trust me. Change to pete? he's not logged in right now. don't know what to do here. |
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 13:34:48 GMT -6
OT is a guaranteed loss
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jul 13, 2017 13:36:01 GMT -6
Canes (2) - fecta, pete Pete (1) - delap Left to vote - Canes |
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 13:36:34 GMT -6
Our options are: both vote for fecta OR convince fecta to change his vote and we both vote Pete
|
|
|
|
Post by Delap on Jul 13, 2017 13:44:49 GMT -6
Can the silenced person change their vote?
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Jul 13, 2017 13:45:26 GMT -6
Our options are: both vote for fecta OR convince fecta to change his vote and we both vote Pete either way without fecta here whether intentionally or unintentionally we go to rng. we would have to be right and then hope for rng luck. |
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Jul 13, 2017 13:45:44 GMT -6
|
|
