|
Idea
Dec 29, 2017 8:21:48 GMT -6
Post by Face-in on Dec 29, 2017 8:21:48 GMT -6
Let's make things more interesting by dialing it back on the position rules and go back to letting people play anywhere (except for PG where a player would need to at least have B+ handles to play there).
I think it would add variety to what people tried to do with building their team and could possibly add more life to the trade market.
If people don't want to go all the way with getting rid of the position rules, we could just go back to allowing true bigs like PF/Cs to play SF and PFs/SFs to play SG.
|
|
|
Idea
Dec 29, 2017 8:22:48 GMT -6
Post by Majic on Dec 29, 2017 8:22:48 GMT -6
I say yes
|
|
|
Idea
Dec 29, 2017 8:24:55 GMT -6
Post by BKay Jewelers on Dec 29, 2017 8:24:55 GMT -6
Let's make things more interesting by dialing it back on the position rules and go back to letting people play anywhere (except for PG where a player would have to have at least have B+ handles to play there). I think it would add variety to what people tried to do with building their team and could possibly add more life to the trade market. If people don't want to go all the way with getting rid of the position rules, we could just go back to allowing true bigs like PF/Cs to play SF and PFs/SFs to play SG. no one would ever go for this idea compuhunch says this idea is 100% bullshit
|
|
|
Idea
Dec 29, 2017 8:44:27 GMT -6
Post by Odin on Dec 29, 2017 8:44:27 GMT -6
Yes
|
|
|
Idea
Dec 29, 2017 9:27:12 GMT -6
Post by [Account Deleted] on Dec 29, 2017 9:27:12 GMT -6
IN
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Dec 29, 2017 9:47:48 GMT -6
Sounds great to me.
|
|
|
Idea
Dec 29, 2017 10:52:48 GMT -6
Post by Delap on Dec 29, 2017 10:52:48 GMT -6
no for me... sounds like people are already afraid for the '54 Braves
|
|
|
Idea
Dec 29, 2017 10:54:41 GMT -6
Druce likes this
Post by eric on Dec 29, 2017 10:54:41 GMT -6
No.
It will accomplish the opposite of what you want it to accomplish - teams will be built with LESS variety if everyone can put a 7' guy at shooting guard. Which brings me to my next point.
It's asinine to have 7' guys playing shooting guard.
There's plenty of variety in team building and there's plenty of action in the trade market.
This is a solution in search of a problem.
|
|
|
Idea
Dec 29, 2017 12:39:15 GMT -6
Post by Face-in on Dec 29, 2017 12:39:15 GMT -6
Poll added.
20s would obviously get final say no matter what the results are.
|
|
|
Idea
Dec 29, 2017 13:10:43 GMT -6
Post by SPL on Dec 29, 2017 13:10:43 GMT -6
would be a no for me
|
|
|
Idea
Dec 29, 2017 13:27:46 GMT -6
Post by kn88 on Dec 29, 2017 13:27:46 GMT -6
|
|
|
Idea
Dec 31, 2017 0:30:24 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Lazy Pete on Dec 31, 2017 0:30:24 GMT -6
Nein
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 5, 2018 12:44:42 GMT -6
Post by gbgalla24 on Jan 5, 2018 12:44:42 GMT -6
Bosh would be worth his ridiculous contract if I could play him at SG/SF.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 5, 2018 13:51:05 GMT -6
Post by eric on Jan 5, 2018 13:51:05 GMT -6
Bosh would be worth his ridiculous contract if I could play him at SG/SF. if only someone had repeatedly offered to take The Boshstrich off your hands for expirings
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 15, 2018 9:38:38 GMT -6
Post by BKay Jewelers on Jan 15, 2018 9:38:38 GMT -6
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 17, 2018 10:06:16 GMT -6
Post by Heebs on Jan 17, 2018 10:06:16 GMT -6
No. It will accomplish the opposite of what you want it to accomplish - teams will be built with LESS variety if everyone can put a 7' guy at shooting guard. Which brings me to my next point. It's asinine to have 7' guys playing shooting guard. There's plenty of variety in team building and there's plenty of action in the trade market. This is a solution in search of a problem. This makes sense to me.
|
|