|
|
Post by dilworth on May 8, 2014 8:35:52 GMT -6
Rockets send:
'01 2nd
Bucks send:
'03 1st
*this is continuation of trade #5 and has been pre-approved by Odin
|
|
Trofie
Former GM 
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 1,812
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Trofie on May 8, 2014 8:36:34 GMT -6
agreed
|
|
Trofie
Former GM
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 1,812
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Trofie on May 8, 2014 8:39:49 GMT -6
I only did this because I think I will win the title in 03. So not a good first rounder. Then I think Dil being the horrible GM he is will prob have the worst record this year. Netting me the highest 2nd. Saves me about 2 mil for just 1 spot in the draft , 2 years in the Future.  |
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 8, 2014 8:54:51 GMT -6
What the hell? so Limiting trade to 2 1sts during creation was just bullshit?
|
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on May 8, 2014 9:15:22 GMT -6
Team I said 2 salmon
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 8, 2014 9:18:45 GMT -6
this wedding is horseshit
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 8, 2014 9:19:07 GMT -6
This trade should be an automatic veto
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2014 9:25:56 GMT -6
This trade should be an automatic veto My trade with JHB was made during the draft too :o |
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on May 8, 2014 9:25:58 GMT -6
I don't understand why this couldn't have been included in trade #5. We were allowed to trade up to 3 years of picks
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2014 9:26:59 GMT -6
I don't understand why this couldn't have been included in trade #5. We were allowed to trade up to 3 years of picks Technically two People promised other picks after the draft for further incentive. Ian is upset that he didnt think about it |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 8, 2014 9:27:20 GMT -6
I don't understand why this couldn't have been included in trade #5. We were allowed to trade up to 3 years of picks no, creation and two more drafts, so '01, '02 |
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 8, 2014 9:27:46 GMT -6
No, we were only allowed to trade 2 future 1sts during the creation.
This deal was just apparently made under the table to get around that rule, and if this shit was "pre-approved", I don't even know what to say to that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 8, 2014 9:28:27 GMT -6
I don't understand why this couldn't have been included in trade #5. We were allowed to trade up to 3 years of picks Technically two People promised other picks after the draft for further incentive. Ian is upset that he didnt think about it lol ok. doesn't take a rocket scientist to come up with that plan. it was against the rules though. |
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on May 8, 2014 9:28:39 GMT -6
oh ok. ignore me
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2014 9:28:45 GMT -6
So this is how Ian quits this time around
Thanks trofie/dilworth
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 8, 2014 9:29:08 GMT -6
I don't understand why this couldn't have been included in trade #5. We were allowed to trade up to 3 years of picks Technically two People promised other picks after the draft for further incentive. Ian is upset that he didnt think about it lol at "didn't think about it" you aren't suppose to be ALLOWED to do shit like this |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2014 9:29:37 GMT -6
Technically two People promised other picks after the draft for further incentive. Ian is upset that he didnt think about it lol ok. doesn't take a rocket scientist to come up with that plan. it was against the rules though. Was it though? They traded two firsts during the draft. Sorry you didnt take advantage of the loophole |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 8, 2014 9:31:15 GMT -6
lol ok. doesn't take a rocket scientist to come up with that plan. it was against the rules though. Was it though? They traded two firsts during the draft. Sorry you didnt take advantage of the loophole sorry i didnt take advantage of a loophole that was talked about before the draft started and said wouldn't be allowed. i see you're going full retard for the second consecutive day. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2014 9:34:49 GMT -6
Was it though? They traded two firsts during the draft. Sorry you didnt take advantage of the loophole sorry i didnt take advantage of a loophole that was talked about before the draft started and said wouldn't be allowed. i see you're going full retard for the second consecutive day. People traded two future firsts during the draft and up to 5 years after the draft. No one said anything about this |
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 8, 2014 9:36:36 GMT -6
Then like I said, if we're taking this trade at face value, it should be an automatic veto.
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 8, 2014 9:37:51 GMT -6
sorry i didnt take advantage of a loophole that was talked about before the draft started and said wouldn't be allowed. i see you're going full retard for the second consecutive day. People traded two future firsts during the draft and up to 5 years after the draft. No one said anything about this this was talked about specifically, and decided on that the two trades would be looked at separately. a 2nd rounder for a 1st hardly seems fair. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 8, 2014 9:38:37 GMT -6
it must have been talked about on the day it took you 7 hours to change a flat.
|
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on May 8, 2014 9:39:50 GMT -6
:gaddam:
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2014 9:41:58 GMT -6
it must have been talked about on the day it took you 7 hours to change a flat. It was more than a flat, dumbass. My ball joint broke. But I guess you could fix that on the side of the road, dumbass. |
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on May 8, 2014 9:45:52 GMT -6
it must have been talked about on the day it took you 7 hours to change a flat. It was more than a flat, dumbass. My ball joint broke. But I guess you could fix that on the side of the road, dumbass. were you offroading or something? |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 8, 2014 9:57:51 GMT -6
it must have been talked about on the day it took you 7 hours to change a flat. It was more than a flat, dumbass. My ball joint broke. But I guess you could fix that on the side of the road, dumbass. Yeah we have before. |
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on May 8, 2014 10:03:13 GMT -6
I bet the nut came loose and that's it...pusaay
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 8, 2014 10:06:32 GMT -6
It was more than a flat, dumbass. My ball joint broke. But I guess you could fix that on the side of the road, dumbass. were you offroading or something? No, ball joints on the short buses give out quite often. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 8, 2014 10:22:24 GMT -6
 Found a pic of Sir Dump waiting for the ball joint to be changed. |
|
|
|
Post by KwYawnza on May 8, 2014 10:30:25 GMT -6
This is pretty shitty.
|
|
