IanBoyd
Former GM 
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 22, 2014 21:48:59 GMT -6
Magic in a clipper uniform...that ain't right...
|
|
|
|
Post by MJ on May 22, 2014 21:58:54 GMT -6
Should trade magic to the magic imo. We fucking named the franchise after him
|
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on May 22, 2014 22:47:08 GMT -6
Y thank ya
|
|
Trofie
Former GM
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 1,812
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Trofie on May 22, 2014 23:26:45 GMT -6
Sterling is turning in his grave
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 23, 2014 0:57:35 GMT -6
Niggas
|
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on May 23, 2014 10:47:12 GMT -6
these have gone in the order i would have picked them in so far
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2014 10:52:38 GMT -6
God damnit Tobias
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on May 23, 2014 10:54:21 GMT -6
i'd have taken paxson over natt personally
|
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on May 23, 2014 10:57:04 GMT -6
I would have taken moncrief but it's a toss up on who has what potential
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 23, 2014 10:59:35 GMT -6
i'm banking on paxson's C+ being mostly jumpshot
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 23, 2014 11:00:12 GMT -6
since that's what his profile says
|
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on May 23, 2014 11:08:15 GMT -6
the only downside is you wont be able to put any bonus points into his jumper unless you do it next year
|
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on May 23, 2014 11:09:39 GMT -6
i need to get on the software and see how high the 3pt can be with a solid jumper
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 23, 2014 11:22:44 GMT -6
70 40 split is C+ or B-
if that is B-, then 70 30 or 70 35 is definitely C+ (which is how I made guys like Wade and whatnot)
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on May 23, 2014 12:07:13 GMT -6
shocked that magic went first
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on May 23, 2014 12:17:11 GMT -6
i still think it'd be great if we were able to see all grades for every attribute like in the baseball league
|
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on May 23, 2014 12:23:35 GMT -6
wouldn't that remove like all of the drama from the draft? gary bossert never would have slid to 9, or whatever stupid late slot odin got him in
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on May 23, 2014 12:28:22 GMT -6
im not sure it would remove drama, the draft would just be more accurate as far as the best players going early. we still wouldn't see potential, just individual grades
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2014 12:32:04 GMT -6
Yes because that worked out so well in 3.0
|
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on May 23, 2014 12:32:45 GMT -6
So just like the new software we did in 3.0? Wasn't a fan
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on May 23, 2014 12:35:09 GMT -6
i guess im in the minority in wanting to know what players are good at instead of just guessing. i think the team pages and displayed grades should remain the same, then you click on the player profile and it gives you the numbered attribute grades.
|
|
Buster 5000
Former GM
Posts: 4,828
Likes: 1,382
Dump Bucks: 10,950
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Buster 5000 on May 23, 2014 12:38:25 GMT -6
Not a fan of seeing the whole grade set. Also not a fan of Magic playing for the Clippers. He doesn't like it either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on May 23, 2014 12:39:43 GMT -6
someone please tell me one negative of seeing the whole grade set on the player page
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 23, 2014 12:40:27 GMT -6
besides not being a fan of numbers over letters, its also impossible to display them in 2.0's software for uploads
|
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on May 23, 2014 12:40:40 GMT -6
someone please tell me one negative of seeing the whole grade set on the player page because there should be some risk to the draft, just like in real life. and this is said as someone who got raped by the draft worse than anyone in 2.0. |
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 23, 2014 12:42:05 GMT -6
because potential isn't the biggest factor in a prospect, starting grades are. You take away the mystery behind the grades, then Odin/whoever will never be able to make a "commish special" sleeper players that slip the the bottom of the 1st round or 2nd round.
|
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on May 23, 2014 12:42:23 GMT -6
Looking at 10 letters per player is a bit much imo. I look at % and stats
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on May 23, 2014 12:44:04 GMT -6
Looking at 10 letters per player is a bit much imo. I look at % and stats you cant for rookies |
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on May 23, 2014 12:44:14 GMT -6
Guys like Scoonie Penn, Charlie, Michael Redd etc would be top 10 picks when they have the displayed grades of someone who only warrants a 1.20s pick or 2nd round picks.
Getting lucky in the draft is part of the process, same w/ resignings, FA, TC etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on May 23, 2014 12:47:40 GMT -6
so why do we have to let "getting lucky" be more a part of the league?
|
|
