|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 27, 2014 20:54:31 GMT -6
This is the pool of future draft classes.
NBL 37-40
NBL 41-44
NBL 45-49
BAA 47-49
50-52
53-54
55-56
57-58
59-60
61-62
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 27, 2014 21:02:45 GMT -6
you fuckers are not even going to believe this shit...............  |
|
IanBoyd
Former GM 
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Apr 27, 2014 21:04:35 GMT -6
Guess I'm tanking unless if I don't get a top 5 creation pick
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Apr 27, 2014 21:05:54 GMT -6
So what is the pool of players for the creation draft?
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 27, 2014 21:06:11 GMT -6
Bird and Magic in the first class is crazy
|
|
|
|
Post by dilworth on Apr 27, 2014 21:06:15 GMT -6
Why are we doing draft classes from the 30's 40's and 50's
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Apr 27, 2014 21:07:33 GMT -6
Bird and Magic in the first class is crazy Except Bird was drafted in 1978. |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 27, 2014 21:07:35 GMT -6
So what is the pool of players for the creation draft? 76-77. I've got everything in the file ready except fixing potentials. I should be done late tomorrow. |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 27, 2014 21:08:49 GMT -6
Bird and Magic in the first class is crazy Except Bird was drafted in 1978. I think we argued about this for days for 3.0 and never came to a decision about what to do. I could go either way with it. |
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Apr 27, 2014 21:08:50 GMT -6
So what is the pool of players for the creation draft? 76-77. I've got everything in the file ready except fixing potentials. I should be done late tomorrow. So are those classes from the fifteen to twenty years preceding that going to be eliminated from the pool of future classes or will we just repeat those players if they come up in the randomization? |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 27, 2014 21:09:12 GMT -6
Why are we doing draft classes from the 30's 40's and 50's Why not? |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2014 21:09:30 GMT -6
1977 ain't a bad draft either.
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Apr 27, 2014 21:10:07 GMT -6
Except Bird was drafted in 1978. I think we argued about this for days for 3.0 and never came to a decision about what to do. I could go either way with it. If you're going to do random classes, don't move a generational player from one class into another to suit a narrative. It'll just make one class way too good and another one really shitty. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2014 21:10:08 GMT -6
76-77. I've got everything in the file ready except fixing potentials. I should be done late tomorrow. So are those classes from the fifteen to twenty years preceding that going to be eliminated from the pool of future classes or will we just repeat those players if they come up in the randomization? This is a very good point. |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 27, 2014 21:10:14 GMT -6
76-77. I've got everything in the file ready except fixing potentials. I should be done late tomorrow. So are those classes from the fifteen to twenty years preceding that going to be eliminated from the pool of future classes or will we just repeat those players if they come up in the randomization? Those classes aren't in the pool currently. Later if we want to add those classes to the pool as dudes retire we can, or we can exhaust this list before we do that. |
|
|
|
Post by dilworth on Apr 27, 2014 21:11:25 GMT -6
Why are we doing draft classes from the 30's 40's and 50's Why not? Because no one knows any of those players. I think it's been clear over the years that most people prefer to have familiar players. |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 27, 2014 21:11:26 GMT -6
I think we argued about this for days for 3.0 and never came to a decision about what to do. I could go either way with it. If you're going to do random classes, don't move a generational player from one class into another to suit a narrative. It'll just make one class way too good and another one really shitty. I'm fine with that. |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 27, 2014 21:11:49 GMT -6
Because no one knows any of those players. I think it's been clear over the years that most people prefer to have familiar players. iirc we've used most of those dudes by now and people should be familiar with mikan, dolph, etc. I'm not opposed to combining all of those into 1-3 classes though. |
|
|
|
Post by dilworth on Apr 27, 2014 21:12:55 GMT -6
That's different from entire classes
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Apr 27, 2014 21:13:42 GMT -6
I think it's fine. It'll just be two or three classes and we'll learn the names.
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 27, 2014 21:15:57 GMT -6
That's different from entire classes nothing before 77 is a solo class |
|
|
|
Post by MJ on Apr 27, 2014 21:23:11 GMT -6
fairly confident I just splooged
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Cane on Apr 29, 2014 12:20:28 GMT -6
Because no one knows any of those players. I think it's been clear over the years that most people prefer to have familiar players. there is also almost no information available about 99% of those players and how they played the game |
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Apr 30, 2014 17:56:59 GMT -6
Because no one knows any of those players. I think it's been clear over the years that most people prefer to have familiar players. there is also almost no information available about 99% of those players and how they played the game So we make it up and create sim stars and duds in the process. |
|
![[Account Deleted] Avatar](http://storage.proboards.com/5589790/avatar/ZhaFVHTxVPwmyuOiOKEd.png)
