|
|
Post by Heebs on Apr 10, 2015 9:22:07 GMT -6
Players listed at center (including C/PF) in their draft profile may not be checked at a position other than center or power forward. Only players listed at point guard (including PG/SG, G, and combo guard) in their draft file, or players that are point guard eligible, may be checked at point guard. In order to be eligible to move to a position, a player must be eligible to be checked at that position. **Position checks are done at the GM's risk** When checks are done, players are moved in the software to the desired position to view their grades at that position. These checks may have adverse consequences on the player's current attributes. Certain attributes are capped at certain positions and if a player is moved to that position for a check, his current attributes may be reduced to the cap at that position. If a player's attributes are reduced as a result of a position check, they will not be corrected back to their original number after the check is complete. Position checks are done at the GM's risk.  |
|
IanBoyd
Former GM 
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Apr 10, 2015 9:31:43 GMT -6
:like:
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2015 9:38:57 GMT -6
RIP future Champ Godbolts/Al Horfords
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 10, 2015 11:03:59 GMT -6
seems pointless
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 10, 2015 11:08:54 GMT -6
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2015 11:11:01 GMT -6
Why cant big men be checked at SF?
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 10, 2015 11:12:12 GMT -6
Why cant big men be checked at SF? not all big men, just centers and pf/c in their profile. Guys listed as only PF can still be checked. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2015 11:13:53 GMT -6
Why cant big men be checked at SF? not all big men, just centers and pf/c in their profile. Guys listed as only PF can still be checked. BOOOOO |
|
|
|
Post by Ocho on Apr 10, 2015 11:14:18 GMT -6
So basically Centers can't be checked at SF
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 10, 2015 11:15:15 GMT -6
So basically Centers can't be checked at SF centers and starting this year you will see draft profiles with pf/c as their postions (like Griffin) |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 10, 2015 11:15:46 GMT -6
well it destroys several types of players, which will make everyone more similar and less interesting. if you use position changes it doesn't lower grades based on caps while doing checks. you're limiting what you can do and what we can do and i don't see an upside. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 10, 2015 11:18:34 GMT -6
the upside is not every good post player gets moved to sf because he shoots better there
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 10, 2015 11:21:50 GMT -6
the upside is not every good post player gets moved to sf because he shoots better there i get that. if that's the intent then players should be listed by expected position in the nba, not what they were in college. myles turner is a center? lol no. not at the pro level. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 10, 2015 11:21:58 GMT -6
i dont see a point of making centers when their best position is sf. i dont see the point of making power fowards with their best position pg where they cant even play.
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 10, 2015 11:27:47 GMT -6
i dont see a point of making centers when their best position is sf. i dont see the point of making power fowards with their best position pg where they cant even play. i didn't make centers whose best position was sf, people just moved them there. and the latter statement applies to exactly one player who was intended to be what he is. i see no harm in making an odd player every 5 years. i definitely agree with how annoying it is to watch every decent post player you make get moved to sf. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 10, 2015 11:31:01 GMT -6
i dont see a point of making centers when their best position is sf. i dont see the point of making power fowards with their best position pg where they cant even play. i didn't make centers whose best position was sf, people just moved them there. and the latter statement applies to exactly one player who was intended to be what he is. i see no harm in making an odd player every 5 years. i definitely agree with how annoying it is to watch every decent post player you make get moved to sf. yeah agreed. and that's what im trying to stop with this. there will still be unique players made. |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 10, 2015 11:34:17 GMT -6
i didn't make centers whose best position was sf, people just moved them there. and the latter statement applies to exactly one player who was intended to be what he is. i see no harm in making an odd player every 5 years. i definitely agree with how annoying it is to watch every decent post player you make get moved to sf. yeah agreed. and that's what im trying to stop with this. there will still be unique players made. champ, barkley, kaminsky, turner all were built as post players. the +2% in fg% isn't worth the change. power forwards will always shoot worse than small forwards, it's just the nature of the software. what's more important is how good they are compared to the rest at their position. |
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on Apr 10, 2015 13:23:13 GMT -6
I don't see a flood of good sfs so I don't know why to change it
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 10, 2015 14:36:28 GMT -6
I don't see a flood of good sfs so I don't know why to change it I don't remember seeing this listed as a reason for doing it. |
|
Mad King
Former GM
Mel my queen
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 640
Dump Bucks: 1,000
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Mad King on Apr 10, 2015 14:46:47 GMT -6
I don't see a flood of good sfs so I don't know why to change it I don't remember seeing this listed as a reason for doing it. i don't remember seeing you list this either just my opinion of the only reason why you make the rule. With this rule the SF position is going to drop pretty bad. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Apr 10, 2015 14:48:38 GMT -6
I don't remember seeing this listed as a reason for doing it. i don't remember seeing you list this either just my opinion of the only reason why you make the rule. With this rule the SF position is going to drop pretty bad. no it's not. this isnt going to effect that many players. |
|
Buster 5000
Former GM
Posts: 4,828
Likes: 1,382
Dump Bucks: 10,950
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Buster 5000 on Apr 11, 2015 17:20:00 GMT -6
BOOOOOOOOOOO
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Apr 16, 2015 19:03:44 GMT -6
People getting capped off during checks won't happen if it's done in position changes instead of edit player.
|
|
