|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Jul 16, 2015 16:19:16 GMT -6
And if we are striving for more realistic, healing injuries is one of the least realistic things in the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Jul 16, 2015 16:21:54 GMT -6
Having talented depth isn't even the reason I want to change it, although that becomes a facet affected by the change. If you want to get rid of injury removal that's a whole new argument all together. You could start a discussion thread on that and we could get everyone's opinion. I just saw a bunch of people mentioning depth in this topic so I thought it was connected. I also feel that would be a better way to make depth necessary. I don't care one way or the other if we allow healing injuries, I adapt to whatever rules are set in front of me. Just like I also don't have too strong of feeling on this issue, I voted no just because I have no problem with the way things are now, but if we need to list someone else in the 2nd spot I can adjust to that and will be fine with it as well. Easy to please here. |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jul 16, 2015 17:09:30 GMT -6
Stamina is definitely a stat in the software, it's just only visible in the mdb, so it would be extremely cumbersome to research.
Later tonight I will run seasons with Player A / Player B / Player B vs. Player A / Player A / Player B and we can see what happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jul 16, 2015 18:25:54 GMT -6
a a b a b b pos name
66 57 sf * Tony Battie
1513 1529 pg 2 Vin Baker
1524 1553 pf 2 Mark Blount
1394 1446 sf 2 Kedrick Brown
0 0 Mike James
2551 2492 sf 1 Jumaine Jones
2362 2309 pf 1 Raef LaFrentz
0 0 Walter McCarty
1480 1561 c 2 Chris Mills
0 0 Paul Pierce
1397 1419 sg 2 Eric Williams
2550 2511 sg 1 Jiri Welsch
2482 2463 pg 1 Marcus Banks
2437 2364 c 1 Brandon Hunter
0 0 Kendrick Perkins
12382 12139 starters
7308 7508 bench
66 57 tony battie
So it doesn't really matter. It's about a 2% increase or 0.4% per player, which is within the normal season-to-season variations anyway. Battie has a * because he's not on the DC.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ocho on Jul 16, 2015 19:17:43 GMT -6
Would players not be able to be 2nd string at a different position than the one they start at?
|
|
victorj24
Former GM 
#3030 #neverforget #ohwow
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 191
Joined: January 2015
|
Post by victorj24 on Jul 16, 2015 21:00:05 GMT -6
Voted for change
|
|
victorj24
Former GM
#3030 #neverforget #ohwow
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 191
Joined: January 2015
|
Post by victorj24 on Jul 16, 2015 21:00:31 GMT -6
Voting tied at 11 right now.
|
|
Bruns
Former GM
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 1,025
Dump Bucks: 35,800
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bruns on Jul 17, 2015 8:29:09 GMT -6
Starting to really like this idea and getting rid of injury removal.
|
|
|
|
Post by gbgalla24 on Jul 17, 2015 8:33:13 GMT -6
As I told Soup last night, I don't care for the change because it already seems like the software ignores depth charts as it is. For instance, I had Thabo in the second and third slot of the SG DC, and he played 9 minutes to Q Rich's 39 through the first sim. Harrison I had in slot 1 and 2 with Frank Johnson at slot 3, and Harrison played 38 to Franks 10 per game.
|
|
Trofie
Former GM
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 1,812
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Trofie on Jul 17, 2015 8:50:03 GMT -6
I want to know more about the hidden stamina rating Eric found
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jul 17, 2015 9:06:30 GMT -6
As I told Soup last night, I don't care for the change because it already seems like the software ignores depth charts as it is. For instance, I had Thabo in the second and third slot of the SG DC, and he played 9 minutes to Q Rich's 39 through the first sim. Harrison I had in slot 1 and 2 with Frank Johnson at slot 3, and Harrison played 38 to Franks 10 per game. appears based on eric's trial run that this is 100% true, so we might as well keep it the same if it doesn't effect much |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jul 17, 2015 9:25:19 GMT -6
As I told Soup last night, I don't care for the change because it already seems like the software ignores depth charts as it is. For instance, I had Thabo in the second and third slot of the SG DC, and he played 9 minutes to Q Rich's 39 through the first sim. Harrison I had in slot 1 and 2 with Frank Johnson at slot 3, and Harrison played 38 to Franks 10 per game. appears based on eric's trial run that this is 100% true, so we might as well keep it the same if it doesn't effect much Eric isn't always right. |
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on Jul 17, 2015 9:28:27 GMT -6
I just changed my vote. The pod convinced me.
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jul 17, 2015 9:31:23 GMT -6
rw said he was voting change... so were 13-10 change
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jul 17, 2015 9:32:37 GMT -6
rw said he was voting change... so were 13-10 change He might have already. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jul 17, 2015 9:33:05 GMT -6
Starting to really like this idea and getting rid of injury removal. Start a thread and a poll. |
|
Trofie
Former GM
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 1,812
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Trofie on Jul 17, 2015 9:39:30 GMT -6
I just changed my vote. The pod convinced me. Hey man why don't you try thinking for yourself instead of letting society numb your mind to conformacies that our fore father's fought against. |
|
|
|
Post by gbgalla24 on Jul 17, 2015 10:02:38 GMT -6
As I told Soup last night, I don't care for the change because it already seems like the software ignores depth charts as it is. For instance, I had Thabo in the second and third slot of the SG DC, and he played 9 minutes to Q Rich's 39 through the first sim. Harrison I had in slot 1 and 2 with Frank Johnson at slot 3, and Harrison played 38 to Franks 10 per game. appears based on eric's trial run that this is 100% true, so we might as well keep it the same if it doesn't effect much I first noticed it when I was trying to tank before the draft I picked up Buck Williams. It didn't seem to matter how I set my depth chart after the starters. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 10:20:07 GMT -6
Depth chart means shit except for the starters most of the time so who the fuck cares
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 10:22:46 GMT -6
Only way to change is it is if the software had the "Starter / Backup / Crunch Time" lineup that we used in the fantasy draft
But it doesnt soooo
|
|
|
|
Post by Ocho on Jul 17, 2015 11:55:01 GMT -6
Would players not be able to be 2nd string at a different position than the one they start at? |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jul 17, 2015 11:56:41 GMT -6
no ocho, sorry i thought i answered you last night
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jul 17, 2015 12:12:04 GMT -6
appears based on eric's trial run that this is 100% true, so we might as well keep it the same if it doesn't effect much Eric isn't always right. I'm not, but I think we can agree it would have at most a small effect, whereas making another DC rule will definitely entail more work on your end chasing down people who don't follow it. I haven't voted either way and don't intend to, I don't have a horse in this race. |
|
|
|
Post by KwYawnza on Jul 17, 2015 12:14:29 GMT -6
I have no idea how to fucking set a depth chart I still laugh audibly remembering the year where you essentially posted, "Fuck it, I really don't give a shit, make my DC whatever" and then left it taht way for the whole year That was peak yawn |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 12:21:48 GMT -6
no ocho, sorry i thought i answered you last night So you cant have a 3rd big play both backup PF and C |
|
|
|
Post by Heynong Man on Jul 17, 2015 12:38:33 GMT -6
no ocho, sorry i thought i answered you last night So you cant have a 3rd big play both backup PF and C No it means you can't have a guy start at PF and be the #2 at C |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jul 17, 2015 12:41:36 GMT -6
no ocho, sorry i thought i answered you last night So you cant have a 3rd big play both backup PF and C no you can, for example C- Williams/Thomas/Whoever you want PF- McDyess/Thomas/Whoever you want |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jul 17, 2015 12:41:50 GMT -6
So you cant have a 3rd big play both backup PF and C No it means you can't have a guy start at PF and be the #2 at C this basically |
|
