|
|
Post by Druce on Sept 17, 2015 8:36:10 GMT -6
 John Turner 23 SF 6'8 245 Phillips University B C C C+ B A Turner began his collegiate career at Georgetown but left for undisclosed reasons and ended up at Phillips where he dominated marginal competition. The biggest question mark for Turner is if his production transcends his competition or if he flat lines in the pros. As big a boom or bust prospect there is in the draft. He showed in college he's a very good rebounder, and can score in the post against smaller players. He struggles at the FT line, but he's been known to shoot a three or two in college. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2015 9:20:20 GMT -6
I didnt know that the teacher from Boy Meets World was a NBA player
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Sept 17, 2015 11:05:44 GMT -6
Would not draft. Yuck.
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Sept 17, 2015 11:21:07 GMT -6
Interesting, I kinda liked this grade set as I was typing it up |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Sept 17, 2015 11:27:53 GMT -6
Interesting, I kinda liked this grade set as I was typing it up Combination of the -2 defense vs. rebounding (inference being high jumping) + B inside (high jumping inflates this already average grade), and the C outside with what I assume will be like 25-30ish 3pt rating based on your description. |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Sept 17, 2015 12:19:08 GMT -6
Interesting, I kinda liked this grade set as I was typing it up Combination of the -2 defense vs. rebounding (inference being high jumping) + B inside (high jumping inflates this already average grade), and the C outside with what I assume will be like 25-30ish 3pt rating based on your description. i don't recall jumping being part of rebounding. |
|
|
|
Post by dilworth on Sept 17, 2015 12:37:04 GMT -6
Combination of the -2 defense vs. rebounding (inference being high jumping) + B inside (high jumping inflates this already average grade), and the C outside with what I assume will be like 25-30ish 3pt rating based on your description. i don't recall jumping being part of rebounding. Not following the logic either. More rebounding and less defense most likely means higher defensive and offensive rebounding grades. |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Sept 18, 2015 10:01:58 GMT -6
Ya - that's my mistake.
:facepalm:
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Sept 20, 2015 9:40:47 GMT -6
Interesting, I kinda liked this grade set as I was typing it up Combination of the -2 defense vs. rebounding (inference being high jumping) + B inside (high jumping inflates this already average grade), and the C outside with what I assume will be like 25-30ish 3pt rating based on your description. wut? |
|
