Post by eric on Nov 25, 2015 11:41:31 GMT -6
h/t ANK1990
Handling turns out to be a really weird grade.
1. It's Piecewise
Handling grade works a certain way up to 60 Handling attribute that I'll get into in a second, then a completely different way for 61-100 Handling attribute, AND the two ways don't meet. If you take a guy with 60 Handling and give him 61, he gets the Handling grade he would have had at 51 Handling. This has a larger raw number effect the larger the Handling grade was in the first place. This, I suspect, is how someone got a -1 from a +5, and it's also really friggin' annoying.
2. Piece A is Calculable
5-60 Handling forms a line, which is nice. I have calculated it as follows:
(.67 * Passing + .15 * Quickness) * (1 + .005 * Handling)
There is rounding and I think I'm slightly off, but it's close enough for me. You can use this function for 61+ Handling by substituting (Handling - 10) for Handling, and you'll still be pretty close, but the software actually gives diminishing returns for 61+ Handling, or possibly 71+ and the 61-70 region just appears skewed. There are certainly diminishing returns at some point.
I am updating the attribute posts directly after this.
Handling turns out to be a really weird grade.
1. It's Piecewise
Handling grade works a certain way up to 60 Handling attribute that I'll get into in a second, then a completely different way for 61-100 Handling attribute, AND the two ways don't meet. If you take a guy with 60 Handling and give him 61, he gets the Handling grade he would have had at 51 Handling. This has a larger raw number effect the larger the Handling grade was in the first place. This, I suspect, is how someone got a -1 from a +5, and it's also really friggin' annoying.
2. Piece A is Calculable
5-60 Handling forms a line, which is nice. I have calculated it as follows:
(.67 * Passing + .15 * Quickness) * (1 + .005 * Handling)
There is rounding and I think I'm slightly off, but it's close enough for me. You can use this function for 61+ Handling by substituting (Handling - 10) for Handling, and you'll still be pretty close, but the software actually gives diminishing returns for 61+ Handling, or possibly 71+ and the 61-70 region just appears skewed. There are certainly diminishing returns at some point.
I am updating the attribute posts directly after this.
