Bankz
Former GM 
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jan 1, 2016 17:54:40 GMT -6
No way I take Joel #1
My top 3 via my big board...
1)Parker
2)Exum
3)Wiggins
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2016 18:05:00 GMT -6
No one cares about your big board, Bankz
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Jan 1, 2016 18:10:46 GMT -6
Yeah Bankz we got it the first four times, you don't like Embiid.
I am word doc'ing for when he is selected by the Magic #1 and wins ROY
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Jan 2, 2016 7:46:52 GMT -6
If I got the #1 pick no chance in hell I pass on Wiggins.Hell I would take Parker over Embid No way I take Joel #1 My top 3 via my big board...
1)Parker
2)Exum
3)Wiggins |
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jan 2, 2016 10:52:49 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by SugarShaun on Jan 2, 2016 20:58:50 GMT -6
Dump getting Embiid at 3 is pretty nice. Wiggins still there at 4 is surprising
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2016 21:00:07 GMT -6
2 straight years of dropping at least 2 spots. :(
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jan 2, 2016 21:06:55 GMT -6
Dump is a turd... should of taken Wiggins
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2016 21:08:08 GMT -6
Dump is a turd... should of taken Wiggins His profile scares me a lot C- handling for a wing is not good. could either be slow as fuck or turn the ball over Grant Hill style |
|
|
|
Post by Face-in on Jan 2, 2016 21:11:39 GMT -6
Doesn't Eric dislike Wiggins?
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jan 2, 2016 21:53:56 GMT -6
i hate no man
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Jan 2, 2016 23:02:59 GMT -6
I really wanted Exum. Oh well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Jan 2, 2016 23:03:21 GMT -6
:)
|
|
Trofie
Former GM
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 1,812
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Trofie on Jan 2, 2016 23:06:28 GMT -6
:doitfaggot:
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Jan 2, 2016 23:07:11 GMT -6
Like the balls of Odin to make a selection other than who every one else had at #1
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Jan 2, 2016 23:35:18 GMT -6
I really don't think you could go wrong with any of the top 4 players
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2016 23:36:28 GMT -6
I am happy with Embiid at 1.3
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Jan 2, 2016 23:44:55 GMT -6
I really don't think you could go wrong with any of the top 4 players Parker scares me a little. Still would have taken Embiid 1.1. |
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jan 2, 2016 23:54:49 GMT -6
I would of taken Exum at 1.1 if I was Dump or Buster.
I wouldn't if I was Odin. He just traded for a pretty good PG. I would of gone Parker.
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jan 2, 2016 23:55:59 GMT -6
I really don't think you could go wrong with any of the top 4 players I agree with this... You had a very strong top 4. Any of those 4 could go #1 and I wouldn't call it a bad pick. I guess its what fits your draft plan and roster at the end of the night. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2016 23:59:52 GMT -6
I would of taken Exum at 1.1 if I was Dump or Buster. I wouldn't if I was Odin. He just traded for a pretty good PG. I would of gone Parker. Why the fuck would I draft a fucking PG? |
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jan 3, 2016 0:02:35 GMT -6
I would of taken Exum at 1.1 if I was Dump or Buster. I wouldn't if I was Odin. He just traded for a pretty good PG. I would of gone Parker. Why the fuck would I draft a fucking PG? PGs are the most important position in the league. Exum has great starting grades and is a teenager. All great things imho when evaluating a player. |
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Jan 3, 2016 0:05:44 GMT -6
Dump's point is he needs a couple years of drafting players before he grabs a PG since a good one typically ruins a tank
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jan 3, 2016 0:31:02 GMT -6
Dump's point is he needs a couple years of drafting players before he grabs a PG since a good one typically ruins a tank Number 1 tank this year fell to 3rd spot. |
|
|
|
Post by Lazy Pete on Jan 3, 2016 0:32:31 GMT -6
BPA. If it's a point guard, it's a point guard. I would rather have a top-flight PG prospect and the 6th pick in the next draft than a top-flight big man prospect and the 2nd/3rd
|
|
|
|
Post by [Account Deleted] on Jan 3, 2016 0:32:33 GMT -6
I don't need you to tell me how you can get fucked while tanking. I'm laying over here used up with not even a single reach around given.
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s Navidad on Jan 3, 2016 0:33:25 GMT -6
Tanking is for the birds.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lazy Pete on Jan 3, 2016 0:35:30 GMT -6
Tanking is for the birds. #purpleboard elite do not tank, they reload |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Jan 3, 2016 7:51:07 GMT -6
I would of taken Exum at 1.1 if I was Dump or Buster. I wouldn't if I was Odin. He just traded for a pretty good PG. I would of gone Parker. Exum was priority #1. Floyd was insurance in the event that I didn't get him. Now I have a vet pg I can trade to get something else I need. |
|
|
|
Post by SugarShaun on Jan 3, 2016 9:35:40 GMT -6
I would of taken Exum at 1.1 if I was Dump or Buster. I wouldn't if I was Odin. He just traded for a pretty good PG. I would of gone Parker. Exum was priority #1. Floyd was insurance in the event that I didn't get him. Now I have a vet pg I can trade to get something else I need. He will be a good replacement in Denver when Buster signs Brandon |
|
![[Account Deleted] Avatar](http://storage.proboards.com/5589790/avatar/ZhaFVHTxVPwmyuOiOKEd.png)
