Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2014 16:04:24 GMT -6
This seems like the trade that got me fired in 1.0
Ian can confirm this
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM 
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 15, 2014 16:05:34 GMT -6
no no no, that trade was much much worse...
|
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on Jun 15, 2014 16:05:43 GMT -6
This seems like the trade that got me fired in 1.0 Ian can confirm this if you are suggesting that cocksucker should get fired, i'm with you buddy |
|
|
|
Post by KwYawnza on Jun 15, 2014 16:07:02 GMT -6
Leopard and spots
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 15, 2014 16:08:50 GMT -6
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2014 16:12:09 GMT -6
And 1.0 died shortly after  Look how much I've grown as a GM though |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2014 16:37:03 GMT -6
What a crock of shit
|
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Jun 15, 2014 16:38:36 GMT -6
I have no picks from 3004-3006. I have 3 players who are decent (one is 33 making 20 mil for the next 3 years and declining).
My thought process was to add young players keep Drew and not worry about my picks. With that trade I added 3 young assets and got rid of Frazier. I would finish maybe in the 7-12 range this year, take a PG (Need to replace Foots), then try to win with my young core of random PG/Drew/Barker/Wright/Dawkins. That's not a bad team, especially moving forward at least I thought so.
If I were to trade Foots for two of my picks (Pelicans own two and Magic one) then I'd still have to tank, hoping for players like Dawkins/Wright/Barker.
If I keep Foots/Frazier my team is hopelessly mediocre with no way to improve and an aging Frazier. The season that I'd get my own pick back Foots would be 31, Drew 29.
Figured I'd give my justification for this trade, carry on belittling me.
|
|
Buster 5000
Former GM
Posts: 4,828
Likes: 1,382
Dump Bucks: 10,950
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Buster 5000 on Jun 15, 2014 16:59:02 GMT -6
Sucks for Bruns. Should let it go through and let RW dig his own grave. Not big on vetos.
|
|
w2b
Former GM
Posts: 40
Likes: 10
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by w2b on Jun 15, 2014 17:17:54 GMT -6
|
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 15, 2014 17:18:24 GMT -6
|
|
Swaggy Z
Former GM
3007 Champions
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 149
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Swaggy Z on Jun 15, 2014 17:27:55 GMT -6
Sucks for Bruns. Should let it go through and let RW dig his own grave. Not big on vetos. Think I agree with this the most but am fine with whatever commish decides. |
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Jun 15, 2014 18:13:20 GMT -6
Since this trade is vetoed why don't you all send me your better offers.
|
|
|
|
Post by dilworth on Jun 15, 2014 18:32:57 GMT -6
What a joke
|
|
|
|
Post by 2poor on Jun 15, 2014 18:37:06 GMT -6
Since this trade is vetoed why don't you all send me your better offers. What's the point? You have no idea what a good offer looks like |
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jun 15, 2014 18:37:30 GMT -6
Ian touched on this earlier but I thought the "Trade back in 60 days" thing is not allowed you must keep the player the entire season
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jun 15, 2014 18:38:51 GMT -6
Ian touched on this earlier but I thought the "Trade back in 60 days" thing is not allowed you must keep the player the entire season that is right, but that's not what this is. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jun 15, 2014 18:39:24 GMT -6
i dont think this is as lopsided as people are making it out to be. that frazier contract is woof.
|
|
|
|
Post by scatmanduse on Jun 15, 2014 18:41:18 GMT -6
Since this trade is vetoed why don't you all send me your better offers. Sent |
|
Trofie
Former GM
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 1,812
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Trofie on Jun 15, 2014 18:41:18 GMT -6
Fired
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2014 18:41:38 GMT -6
i dont think this is as lopsided as people are making it out to be. that frazier contract is woof. He still traded 2 elite players for none with no picks involved Dawkins contract is just as woof imo |
|
Bruns
Former GM
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 1,025
Dump Bucks: 35,800
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bruns on Jun 15, 2014 18:41:47 GMT -6
This is me not overreacting, but this isn't done yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jun 15, 2014 18:42:56 GMT -6
i dont think this is as lopsided as people are making it out to be. that frazier contract is woof. He still traded 2 elite players for none with no picks involved Dawkins contract is just as woof imo its no wonder you've never won a championship if you're considering frazier and foots elite. |
|
IanBoyd
Former GM
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 687
Dump Bucks: 8,575
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 15, 2014 18:43:30 GMT -6
i dont think this is as lopsided as people are making it out to be. that frazier contract is woof. Fraizer's contract expires as he has his own firsts to use again. moving Clyde should be like the 4th thing on his list of things to do if that |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jun 15, 2014 18:44:47 GMT -6
i dont think this is as lopsided as people are making it out to be. that frazier contract is woof. Fraizer's contract expires as he has his own firsts to use again. moving Clyde should be like the 4th thing on his list of things to do if that gm's do shit differently. this trade isn't veto worthy. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2014 18:46:01 GMT -6
He still traded 2 elite players for none with no picks involved Dawkins contract is just as woof imo its no wonder you've never won a championship if you're considering frazier and foots elite. I'm not the only one to say that ITT. Iirc Odin feels the same way |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jun 15, 2014 18:47:17 GMT -6
point me to where other people are calling these players elite
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2014 18:48:20 GMT -6
point me to where other people are calling these players elite Can you not read? |
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jun 15, 2014 18:51:16 GMT -6
point me to where other people are calling these players elite Foots isn't elite yet... But with points pumped into him I think he can be. I personally have a offer in for him and I think I may pull it after looking closer at his numbers and the system I run. I personally thought this deal was very lopsided and I have had better deals veto'd so no issue with Odin coming down on this. I actually like a commish who wont let one sided deals go down like this. |
|
RWisoursavior
Former GM
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 128
Joined: June 2014
|
Post by RWisoursavior on Jun 15, 2014 18:53:45 GMT -6
i dont think this is as lopsided as people are making it out to be. that frazier contract is woof. He still traded 2 elite players for none with no picks involved Dawkins contract is just as woof imo I want to get rid of Frazier, you know how many people pm'ed me about him? Zero. He's 33, shooting poorly, and signed to 20 mil+ over the next three years. Frazier has no value to me. You're right I had no picks involved, for a reason. Picks sound good on paper but when they turn into 20 because the team I trade Foots to is gonna be good it makes picks useless. Instead I get a lotto pick from last year who went +3, Soup's excerpt from rookie TC "Exciting TC for Bulls rookie Wright. Gm Bruns has to like what he sees with a +1 bump in defense and a +2 bump in rebounding." I also get C who the GM of the Hawks gave up 3 1st's last season and a PF who dil called the best available PF. |
|
