|
|
Post by eric on Sept 27, 2015 17:42:47 GMT -6
eric: is the 2k dump bucks trade limit for everything or just draft picks?
cheeseb[]_[]rger: everything
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Sept 30, 2015 13:02:52 GMT -6
I posed this to shout and nobody was really sure so here we go.
Scenario
Player X offers to resign with Team A.
Day 1-2 bid deadline is 1:00 pm.
Team B submits bids on Player X before 1:00 pm.
Team A accepts resigning offer after 1:00 pm but before free agency is run.
Is free agency run first, or is the resigning processed first?
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Sept 30, 2015 14:22:55 GMT -6
i always process the resignings before i run free agency
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jan 16, 2016 16:58:57 GMT -6
To be eligible to play PG two of these things must be true about the player in question: 1. B+ or higher handles 2. Listed at PG in the software 3. On a rookie deal 4. Was drafted as a PG or PG was listed on their draft profile Are people listed as PG/SG always eligible for PG, or is PG/SG just another way of saying G and they have to be on a rookie deal and/or B+ handle? |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Jan 16, 2016 20:04:49 GMT -6
To be eligible to play PG two of these things must be true about the player in question: 1. B+ or higher handles 2. Listed at PG in the software 3. On a rookie deal 4. Was drafted as a PG or PG was listed on their draft profile Are people listed as PG/SG always eligible for PG, or is PG/SG just another way of saying G and they have to be on a rookie deal and/or B+ handle? PG/SG = G |
|
|
|
Post by SugarShaun on Jan 16, 2016 20:46:28 GMT -6
So to make sure I understand correctly even though it states 2 of those things must be true Heebs said a SG/SF can still play PG not on their rookie deal as long as they get to B+ handles and Soup said yes.
So if someone went to B+ handling on their 2nd deal even if they were listed at SG/SF they could play PG
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Jan 16, 2016 21:28:25 GMT -6
That was my rule. Soup probably changed it.
|
|
Trofie
Former GM 
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 1,812
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Trofie on Jan 16, 2016 21:42:32 GMT -6
Yes Shaun. Only people never eligible for pg are pf/c
|
|
Bankz
Former GM
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 895
Dump Bucks: 18,475
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Bankz on Jan 16, 2016 22:03:12 GMT -6
I'm glad Heebs updated all the rules for us...
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Jan 17, 2016 14:11:23 GMT -6
First question is about PG eligibility. Here is the written rule about PG eligibility Clarification: Can a player with B+ or better handles be changed to listed at PG in the software if he (i) is NOT on a rookie deal and (ii) was not drafted or listed as a PG in their draft profile? I have understood the rule to be that you have to meet two of the four criteria to be moved to PG, but I think I was wrong and just want to be sure before I include this rule. EXAMPLE: DJ Strawberry was listed as a SG in his draft profile and continues to be listed as a SG in the software. DJ Strawberry is no longer on his rookie contract, but his handling is A-. Is DJ Stawberry eligible to play PG WITHOUT being moved to PG in the software? If no, is DJ Strawberry eligible to be MOVED TO PG in the software? Synthesizing a late night shout explanation. If you are listed as a PG in your draft profile, you are always eligible to play PG. If you are listed as a Guard in your draft profile, you are eligible to play PG during your rookie contract (regardless of whether you have B+ handles), and after your rookie contract IF you have B+ or higher handles. If you are a SG or SF, you are eligible to play PG if you have B+ or higher handles. No player listed as SF/PF, PF, PF/C, or C in their draft profile will be eligible to play PG. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2016 14:12:56 GMT -6
Synthesizing a late night shout explanation. If you are listed as a PG in your draft profile, you are always eligible to play PG. If you are listed as a Guard in your draft profile, you are eligible to play PG during your rookie contract (regardless of whether you have B+ handles), and after your rookie contract IF you have B+ or higher handles. If you are a SG or SF, you are eligible to play PG if you have B+ or higher handles. No player listed as SF/PF, PF, PF/C, or C in their draft profile will be eligible to play PG. What happened to the whole teach a man to fish mentality? |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Jan 17, 2016 14:14:55 GMT -6
What happened to the whole teach a man to fish mentality? I didn't even know where to find this one. Took me a few minutes to find it. |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Jan 17, 2016 14:16:19 GMT -6
I'm glad Heebs updated all the rules for us... Happy birthday, Bankz. With age, comes maturity. |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jan 29, 2016 14:17:16 GMT -6
6. If you don't have birds on the player, the most you can offer them is a 2 year deal starting at 120% of the previous season salary with normal increases.
I know I've asked this before but just to have it written down somewhere.
-I'm at $51,000,000 salary
-I don't have birds on Player A
-He or she made $5,000,000 last year
Can I offer them a deal starting at $6,000,000 or only the MLE?
|
|
Trofie
Former GM
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 1,812
Joined: April 2014
|
Post by Trofie on Jan 29, 2016 14:23:18 GMT -6
6. If you don't have birds on the player, the most you can offer them is a 2 year deal starting at 120% of the previous season salary with normal increases. I know I've asked this before but just to have it written down somewhere. -I'm at $51,000,000 salary -I don't have birds on Player A -He or she made $5,000,000 last year Can I offer them a deal starting at $6,000,000 or only the MLE? 6 |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Jan 29, 2016 14:24:19 GMT -6
6. If you don't have birds on the player, the most you can offer them is a 2 year deal starting at 120% of the previous season salary with normal increases. I know I've asked this before but just to have it written down somewhere. -I'm at $51,000,000 salary -I don't have birds on Player A -He or she made $5,000,000 last year Can I offer them a deal starting at $6,000,000 or only the MLE? yes, you can offer up to a 2 year deal starting at 6 mil with 10% increases, as long as the player was on your team the previous season. |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Mar 15, 2016 10:16:51 GMT -6
Asked in shout:Can you submit a single bid that, without signing anyone else, would put you over the hardcap? I understand the rule allowing you a 24 hour grace period exists, but I thought it was for situations in which multiple offers were accepted. Answer: Yes. As long as the software allows it, I input it. eric - can you work this into lolwrongtmbsl.proboards.com/thread/14/new-hard-cap-rules with your mod powers?
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Mar 23, 2016 11:11:19 GMT -6
MLE Extension question:
Can we extend a new MLE if our extended MLE is expiring?
Example: The Nets sign Daniel Gibson and extend him 2 years. The next year, the Nets sign Stacey Augmon. The Nets cannot extend Stacey Augmon. The following year, in the last year of Gibson's extended MLE, the Nets sign Julius Randle to the MLE canes-style. Can the Nets extend Randle?
The two arguments are: No, stupid. The rule says you cannot extend an MLE if you have an extended MLE on your roster. Even though Gibson is expiring, he is an extended MLE. OR Yes, because you will not have two MLES with extended contracts (ie, contracts lasting beyond the current year).
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Mar 23, 2016 11:45:52 GMT -6
Your first argument.
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Mar 24, 2016 3:26:35 GMT -6
Asked in shout:Can you submit a single bid that, without signing anyone else, would put you over the hardcap? I understand the rule allowing you a 24 hour grace period exists, but I thought it was for situations in which multiple offers were accepted. Answer: Yes. As long as the software allows it, I input it. eric - can you work this into lolwrongtmbsl.proboards.com/thread/14/new-hard-cap-rules with your mod powers? technically, the software allows more than two years on players with less than 3 birds so "Yes. As long as the software allows it, I input it." isn't entirely accurate. |
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Mar 24, 2016 8:06:35 GMT -6
Asked in shout:Can you submit a single bid that, without signing anyone else, would put you over the hardcap? I understand the rule allowing you a 24 hour grace period exists, but I thought it was for situations in which multiple offers were accepted. Answer: Yes. As long as the software allows it, I input it. eric - can you work this into lolwrongtmbsl.proboards.com/thread/14/new-hard-cap-rules with your mod powers? technically, the software allows more than two years on players with less than 3 birds so "Yes. As long as the software allows it, I input it." isn't entirely accurate. He didn't put the 2nd part I said in shout which was "and it follows our rules" |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Mar 24, 2016 10:39:24 GMT -6
technically, the software allows more than two years on players with less than 3 birds so "Yes. As long as the software allows it, I input it." isn't entirely accurate. He didn't put the 2nd part I said in shout which was "and it follows our rules" So irresponsible herbs |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Mar 24, 2016 11:22:54 GMT -6
I assumed it was clear it was in reference to a signing a single player above the hard cap and was not about bird-year bids, which have a clear rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on May 20, 2016 14:25:01 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Mar 21, 2017 11:11:40 GMT -6
20s Navidad - we talked last offseason about this change. Can we make it? Rules for SC/RC of players during the offseason: No player drafted or signed in FA that was not on your team immediately before the offseason may be given an SC or RC during the offseason. Note: these players may be upgraded like normal after TC. Players you may NOT SC/RC - players drafted that offseason - players signed in FA by a team other than the team they played for at the end of the last season For the avoidance of doubt - you may RC or SC a player if you acquire that player in the offseason via trade, and that player was on the trading team immediately before the end of the season. Example: The Nets trade Anthony Davis for Diamond Stone, a veteran under contract during the offseason. Under the current rules, the Nets cannot upgrade him until after TC. Under the proposed rule, the Nets could upgrade him during the offseason even though he wasn't on the Nets at the trade deadline.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2017 11:36:44 GMT -6
but why? it makes no sense
|
|
|
|
Post by FectaDEEZ on Mar 21, 2017 11:39:59 GMT -6
but why? it makes no sense Agree. What is the point ? I'm probably missing something. |
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Mar 21, 2017 12:00:01 GMT -6
Edited the post to clarify. Sorry for any confusion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Souper Troopers on Mar 24, 2017 18:16:07 GMT -6
Retroactive RC/SC should only count on players that were on your team the year before. Not sure why you want to change it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heebs on Mar 24, 2017 18:41:01 GMT -6
Retroactive RC/SC should only count on players that were on your team the year before. Not sure why you want to change it. I want to change it because I want to have additional opportunities to upgrade my players. Also they are not retroactive. |
|
